share_log

Does W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

美國固安捷(紐交所:GWW)的資產負債表健康嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  07/21 09:09

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

霍華德·馬克斯說得很好,他說,與其擔心股價波動,不如擔心永久性損失的風險,我認爲......每個實踐的投資者都會擔心。因此,當您考慮某隻股票有多大風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,W.W. Grainger,Inc.(NYSE:GWW)確實承擔了一筆債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否使公司變得冒險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務對於企業有所幫助,直到企業無法再用新的資本或自由現金流償還債務時。如果情況真的非常糟糕,債權人可以控制企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低廉的股票價格稀釋股東權益,以便控制債務。當然,使用債務的好處在於它通常代表着廉價資本,尤其是當債務用於替代在可獲得高回報的公司中稀釋股東權益時。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的結合。

What Is W.W. Grainger's Debt?

W.W. Grainger的債務是什麼?

As you can see below, W.W. Grainger had US$2.30b of debt, at March 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$804.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.49b.

如下所示,W.W. Grainger在2024年3月有23億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲得更詳細信息。但是,它也有8040萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲14.9億美元。

big
NYSE:GWW Debt to Equity History July 21st 2024
債務/股本歷史記錄 / GWW NYSE-2024年7月21日

How Strong Is W.W. Grainger's Balance Sheet?

W.W. Grainger的資產負債表強度如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that W.W. Grainger had liabilities of US$2.53b due within a year, and liabilities of US$2.36b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$804.0m and US$2.33b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$1.76b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,W.W. Grainger的一年內到期的負債總額爲25.3億美元,到期後還款的負債總額爲23.6億美元。另一方面,它有8040萬美元的現金和23.3億美元的一年內到期的應收賬款。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合高出1.76億美元。

Of course, W.W. Grainger has a titanic market capitalization of US$46.4b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,W.W. Grainger擁有464億美元的巨大市值,因此這些負債可能是可以管理的。但是有足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東繼續關注資產負債表的情況。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

W.W. Grainger has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.53. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 28.9 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, W.W. Grainger grew its EBIT by 8.0% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if W.W. Grainger can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

W.W. Grainger的淨債務/EBITDA比率僅爲0.53。其EBIt覆蓋其利息費用高達28.9倍。因此,您可以認爲它所面臨的債務風險不會比大象面臨老鼠更大。幸運的是,W.W. Grainger在過去一年中將其EBIt增加了8.0%,這使得負債負擔看起來更加可控。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到大多數債務。但是,最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定W.W. Grainger能否隨時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看此免費報告,其中包含分析師利潤預測。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, W.W. Grainger produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 53% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,公司需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤不足以勝任。因此,我們始終會檢查多少EBIt轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,W.W. Grainger產生了牢固的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的53%,大約符合我們的預期。這筆實打實的現金意味着它可以在想要償還債務時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that W.W. Grainger's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And that's just the beginning of the good news since its net debt to EBITDA is also very heartening. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like W.W. Grainger is pretty sensible with its use of debt. That means they are taking on a bit more risk, in the hope of boosting shareholder returns. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for W.W. Grainger that you should be aware of.

好消息是,W.W. Grainger有能力使用其EBIt來支付其利息費用,而這使我們像毛絨絨的小狗一樣高興。而且,它的淨債務/EBITDA也非常令人振奮。考慮到以上因素的範圍,看起來W.W. Grainger在利用債務方面相當明智。這意味着他們冒了更大的風險,希望提高股東的回報率。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的明顯位置。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都在資產負債表中-遠非如此。例如,我們已經確定了W.W. Grainger的一項警告信號,希望您能注意到。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有負債負擔的股票的投資者,則今天就可以發現我們的獨家淨現金增長股清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論