C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) 9.0% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 49% as Well as Institutions
C3.ai, Inc.'s (NYSE:AI) 9.0% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 49% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over C3.ai by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 43% of the company
- Insider ownership in C3.ai is 11%
- 零售投資者對C3.ai的重大控制意味着普通公衆更有權力影響管理和治理相關決策。
- 前25名股東擁有公司43%的股份。
- C3.ai的內部持股爲11%。
A look at the shareholders of C3.ai, Inc. (NYSE:AI) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 49% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看C3.ai, Inc.(紐交所:AI)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。持有最多股份的群體是持有49%所有權的零售投資者,換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 9.0% price drop, institutions with their 39% holdings also suffered.
雖然上週9.0%的股價下跌使零售投資者的持股份額受到打擊,但持有39%份額的機構也受到了影響。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of C3.ai.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了C3.ai的不同持股群體。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240722/0-4596c2462d10abd76e26a1a1af9dd5c2-0-5b856efec9cabf77ae050cb13cce1309.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About C3.ai?
機構所有權對C3.ai有什麼啓示?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
C3.ai already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at C3.ai's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
C3.ai已經被機構納入股東名冊。事實上,它們持有公司的可觀股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下C3.ai下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240722/0-4596c2462d10abd76e26a1a1af9dd5c2-1-6c246008623586577718d2d912febfc6.png/big)
C3.ai is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Thomas Siebel, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
C3.ai不是由對沖基金持有。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司持股最多的股東,持有8.5%的流通股。爲了讓你了解上下文,持有第二大股份的股東持有約7.7%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.3%的股份。Thomas Siebel是第二大股東,也持有首席執行官頭銜。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of C3.ai
C3.ai的內幕持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of C3.ai, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$374m stake in this US$3.5b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
C3.ai, Inc.的內部持股比例相當可觀。看到董事會與他們一起投資是非常有趣的。您可以查看這個免費的圖表,顯示內部人士最近的交易情況。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 49% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over C3.ai. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有49%的所有權,普通公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對C3.ai有一定的影響力。儘管該持股規模相當可觀,但如果該決定與其他大股東不協調,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for C3.ai that you should be aware of before investing here.
我非常有興趣看看到底是誰擁有公司。但是,爲了真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了C3.ai的兩個警告信號,你在此之前應該了解。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。