share_log

Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 60% of the Company

Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 60% of the Company

洛斯公司(紐交所:L)主要由機構投資者控制,他們擁有該公司的60%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/23 07:12

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Loews' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 考慮到機構對Loews的股票持有量很高,他們的交易決策可能會對其股票價格造成影響。
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Loews Corporation (NYSE:L) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察Loews Corporation (紐交所: L) 的股東可以得知哪個群體最具影響力。我們可以看到機構持有公司60%的所有權。換句話說,該群體有最大的獲利(或虧損)可能。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Loews, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Loews的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:L Ownership Breakdown July 23rd 2024
紐交所: L所有權結構拆分於2024年7月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Loews?

機構持有情況對Loews的意義是什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Loews already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Loews, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Loews已經有機構在其股東名冊上。事實上,他們擁有公司很高的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡這個股票。但是,他們也可能像其他人一樣錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖清倉,則往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Loews的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:L Earnings and Revenue Growth July 23rd 2024
紐交所: L收益和營業收入增長情況於2024年7月23日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Loews. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.6% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are James Tisch and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.1%. James Tisch, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的影響力。對於Loews,對沖基金並不持有太多股份。目前最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有公司9.6%的流通股。第二大和第三大股東是James Tisch和BlackRock,Inc.,他們的股份數相等,均爲7.1%。而排名第二的股東James Tisch也是首席執行官。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Loews

Loews的內部股份佔有情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Loews Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$17b, and insiders have US$3.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有Loews Corporation相當比例的股份。其市值僅爲170億美元,內部人員以自己的名義擁有30億美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人會說,尤其是在這樣一家規模的公司中,這顯示了與股東的較高一致性。您可以單擊此處以查看那些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 23% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司的23%股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管佔有的股份較大,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持一致,這家公司的政策可能無法改變。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Loews that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查看公司實際所有者的情況非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,在投資此處之前,我們已發現Loews存在1個警告信號,您應該知道。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論