share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

帕克漢尼汾公司(紐交所股票代碼:PH)擁有83%的股份,由機構投資者控制。
Simply Wall St ·  07/23 07:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Parker-Hannifin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持有Parker-Hannifin的大量股份暗示着他們對公司股價有重大的影響力。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有這家公司48%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE:PH), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 83% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Parker-Hannifin Corporation (NYSE: PH),那麼你需要查看它的股份登記簿。機構擁有該公司的最大股份,達到83%。換句話說,該集團面臨的上行潛力(或下行風險)最大。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Parker-Hannifin, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Parker-Hannifin的各類股東,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:PH Ownership Breakdown July 23rd 2024
NYSE:PH所有權分佈於2024年7月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Parker-Hannifin?

機構持股對Parker-Hannifin有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Parker-Hannifin. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Parker-Hannifin's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Parker-Hannifin中擁有相當數量的股票。這表明專業投資者之間有一定的信任度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,你就會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看Parker-Hannifin下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:PH Earnings and Revenue Growth July 23rd 2024
2024年7月23日,PH在紐交所的盈利和營業收入增長。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Parker-Hannifin. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.2% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.1% and 4.2% of the stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際擁有超過半數的公司股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的權力。對於Parker-Hannifin而言,對沖基金持有的股票不多。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有8.2%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.1%和4.2%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Parker-Hannifin

Parker-Hannifin的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Parker-Hannifin Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$374m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有Parker-Hannifin Corporation的股份不到1%。這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果看到內部人士擁有大量公司股份,這會讓人感到驚訝。雖然他們持有的比例不到1%,我們可以看到,董事會成員共同擁有價值3,7400萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員持有股份是一個好的信號,但是我們也值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Parker-Hannifin. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔股16%的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Parker-Hannifin有一定的影響力。雖然佔股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Parker-Hannifin better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Parker-Hannifin has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮到不同的股東群體,總是值得思考一家公司的股權結構。但爲了更好地了解Parker-Hannifin,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,風險- Parker-Hannifin有2個警示標誌,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論