The 18% Return This Week Takes Clearwater Paper's (NYSE:CLW) Shareholders Five-year Gains to 195%
The 18% Return This Week Takes Clearwater Paper's (NYSE:CLW) Shareholders Five-year Gains to 195%
When you buy a stock there is always a possibility that it could drop 100%. But on the bright side, you can make far more than 100% on a really good stock. Long term Clearwater Paper Corporation (NYSE:CLW) shareholders would be well aware of this, since the stock is up 195% in five years. On top of that, the share price is up 38% in about a quarter.
當你購買一隻股票時,它總有可能下跌100%。但從好的一面看,一隻好的股票可以獲得遠比100%更多的收益。長揸克利爾沃特紙業公司(NYSE:CLW)的股東會很清楚這一點,因爲該股票在五年內上漲了195%。此外,在一個季度左右的時間裏,股價上漲了38%。
On the back of a solid 7-day performance, let's check what role the company's fundamentals have played in driving long term shareholder returns.
在穩定的七天表現之後,讓我們看看公司的基本面對長期股東回報的影響。
To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
引用巴菲特的話說,“船隻會在世界各地航行,但是持平地球學會會蓬勃發展。在市場上,價格和價值之間將繼續存在巨大的差距……”評估公司周圍情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
During the last half decade, Clearwater Paper became profitable. That kind of transition can be an inflection point that justifies a strong share price gain, just as we have seen here. Given that the company made a profit three years ago, but not five years ago, it is worth looking at the share price returns over the last three years, too. We can see that the Clearwater Paper share price is up 87% in the last three years. In the same period, EPS is up 8.4% per year. Notably, the EPS growth has been slower than the annualised share price gain of 23% over three years. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it did three years ago.
在過去的五年中,克利爾沃特紙業實現了盈利。這種轉變可能是一個拐點,從而使股價大幅上漲,就像我們在這裏看到的那樣。考慮到公司三年前實現了盈利,但五年前沒有,這也值得關注過去三年股票回報率。我們可以看到克利爾沃特紙業股價在過去的三年中上漲了87%。在同一時期,每股收益每年增長8.4%。值得注意的是,EPS的增長速度比過去三年年化股價上漲23%的速度要慢。因此,可以合理地假設市場對業務的看法比三年前更高。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240723/0-e50bde38a118ab5559fdcc1d03bfbf77-0-147baa00452683af90aa92e7a7c426d5.png/big)
We know that Clearwater Paper has improved its bottom line lately, but is it going to grow revenue? You could check out this free report showing analyst revenue forecasts.
我們知道,克利爾沃特紙業的底線有所改善,但它會增加營業收入嗎?您可以查看此免費報告,了解分析師的營業收入預測。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
It's nice to see that Clearwater Paper shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 68% over the last year. That's better than the annualised return of 24% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Clearwater Paper better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Clearwater Paper you should know about.
很高興看到克利爾沃特紙業的股東們在過去一年中獲得了總股東回報率68%。這比過去半個十年的年化回報率24%要好,這意味着公司最近做得更好。考慮到股價勢頭仍然強勁,值得更仔細地觀察這隻股票,以免錯失機會。長期跟蹤股價表現總是很有趣的。但要更好地理解克利爾沃特紙業,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮風險。每個公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了1個警告信號,您應該知道它。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果您願意查看另一家公司(具有潛在的更好財務狀況),請不要錯過這個免費的公司列表,證明它們可以增長收益。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。