share_log

China Post Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688648) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week

China Post Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688648) Biggest Owners Are Private Companies Who Got Richer After Stock Soared 13% Last Week

中國郵政科技股份有限公司(SHSE:688648)最大股東是在股價上漲13%後富裕起來的私人公司。
Simply Wall St ·  20:24

Key Insights

主要見解

  • China Post Technology's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 62% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Institutions own 11% of China Post Technology
  • 中國郵政科技的重要私營企業所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前兩位股東持有62%的業務。
  • 機構持有中國郵政科技的11%。

Every investor in China Post Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688648) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

中國郵政科技有限公司(SHSE:688648)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強有力的股東群體。我們可以看到,私營企業擁有公司55%的所有權。也就是說,該集團將在股票上漲時受益最大(或在經濟下行時損失最大)。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.2b market cap following a 13% gain in the stock.

因此,私營企業共同擁有CN¥32億的市值,在股票上漲13%後上周得分最高。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about China Post Technology.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對中國郵政科技有什麼告訴我們。

big
SHSE:688648 Ownership Breakdown July 24th 2024
SHSE:688648所有權結構2024年7月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About China Post Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於中國郵政科技?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

China Post Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see China Post Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

中國郵政科技已有機構在股東名冊上。他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要警惕依賴所謂的機構投資者的認可。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們處於“擁擠交易”的風險。在沒有成長曆程的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到中國郵政科技的歷史收益和營收,但要記住,故事總是有更多的一面。

big
SHSE:688648 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 24th 2024
SHSE:688648收益和營收增長2024年7月24日

China Post Technology is not owned by hedge funds. China Post Group Corporation Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 49% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 2.6% of the stock.

中國郵政科技不是由對沖基金所有。中國郵政集團有限公司目前是最大的股東,持有49%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約13%和2.6%的股份。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 62% stake.

股東註冊表的更詳細的研究顯示,前兩名股東分別持有該公司的62%股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of China Post Technology

中國郵政科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我們注意到我們的數據並沒有顯示任何董事會成員擁有股份。董事會成員至少擁有一些個人持倉是不尋常的,因此我們的數據可能有缺陷。下一步是檢查CEO的薪酬水平。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 13%, private equity firms could influence the China Post Technology board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

持有13%股份的私募股權公司可能會影響中國郵政科技的董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權公司有時是要求管理層負責的激進份子。但其他時候,私募股權是出售,並且將公司上市。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 55%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司55%的股份,這是一種高比例佔股。這將值得更深入地了解。如果相關方,例如內部人士在其中的一個私營公司持有利益,那麼股份註冊情況中應該有所披露。私營公司也可能對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for China Post Technology you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。恰恰相反:我們已經發現中國郵政科技的一個警告標誌,您應該知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論