There's Been No Shortage Of Growth Recently For Bloomin' Brands' (NASDAQ:BLMN) Returns On Capital
There's Been No Shortage Of Growth Recently For Bloomin' Brands' (NASDAQ:BLMN) Returns On Capital
There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. In a perfect world, we'd like to see a company investing more capital into its business and ideally the returns earned from that capital are also increasing. Ultimately, this demonstrates that it's a business that is reinvesting profits at increasing rates of return. So on that note, Bloomin' Brands (NASDAQ:BLMN) looks quite promising in regards to its trends of return on capital.
如果我們想要找到下一個多袋股,有幾個關鍵趨勢需要關注。在完美的世界中,我們希望看到一家公司投入更多資本到其業務中,而且最好從該資本中獲得的回報也在增加。這最終表明這是一家正在以逐漸增加的收益率再投資利潤的公司。因此,在這方面,Bloomin' Brands (NASDAQ:BLMN) 在資本回報率的趨勢方面看起來相當有前途。
What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?
我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。
For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Bloomin' Brands:
對於那些不知道ROCE是什麼的人,ROCE是一種公司年利潤(其回報)相對於業務中使用的資本而言的衡量指標。分析師使用這個公式來計算Bloomin' Brands的ROCE:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。
0.13 = US$323m ÷ (US$3.4b - US$894m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).
0.13 = US$ 32300萬 ÷ (US$34億 - US$894m)(基於截至2024年3月的過去十二個月)。
Thus, Bloomin' Brands has an ROCE of 13%. In absolute terms, that's a satisfactory return, but compared to the Hospitality industry average of 11% it's much better.
因此,Bloomin' Brands的ROCE爲13%。絕對來講,這是一個令人滿意的回報,但與酒店行業平均水平的11%相比要好得多。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240724/0-87913a5e11aa895bd5078786973d4843-0-0385d0ef525f15ec7af9d409c2f61556.png/big)
Above you can see how the current ROCE for Bloomin' Brands compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Bloomin' Brands .
你可以看到Bloomin' Brands目前的ROCE如何與其過去的資本回報率相比,但是從過去只能得出有限的信息。如果你想看看分析師對未來的預測,你應該查看我們的免費分析師報告,了解Bloomin' Brands的情況。
So How Is Bloomin' Brands' ROCE Trending?
那麼Bloomin' Brands的ROCE趨勢如何?
Bloomin' Brands' ROCE growth is quite impressive. The figures show that over the last five years, ROCE has grown 89% whilst employing roughly the same amount of capital. So our take on this is that the business has increased efficiencies to generate these higher returns, all the while not needing to make any additional investments. The company is doing well in that sense, and it's worth investigating what the management team has planned for long term growth prospects.
Bloomin' Brands的ROCE增長相當驚人。數據顯示,在過去的五年中,ROCE增長了89%,而使用的資本數量大致相同。因此,我們認爲這家企業提高了效率以產生這些更高的回報,同時不需要進行任何額外的投資。在這方面,該公司做得很好,值得探究管理團隊在長期增長前景方面的計劃。
What We Can Learn From Bloomin' Brands' ROCE
我們可以從Bloomin' Brands的ROCE學到什麼?
To bring it all together, Bloomin' Brands has done well to increase the returns it's generating from its capital employed. Investors may not be impressed by the favorable underlying trends yet because over the last five years the stock has only returned 21% to shareholders. So with that in mind, we think the stock deserves further research.
總而言之,Bloomin' Brands做得不錯,它提高了從其使用的資本中獲得的回報。投資者可能還不太滿意底層趨勢,因爲在過去的五年中,該股票僅爲股東帶來了21%的回報。因此,考慮到這一點,我們認爲該股票值得進一步研究。
On a final note, we found 4 warning signs for Bloomin' Brands (1 doesn't sit too well with us) you should be aware of.
最後,我們找到了4個關於Bloomin' Brands的警告信號(其中有一個我們不太滿意),你應該注意以下。
While Bloomin' Brands isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.
雖然Bloomin' Brands沒有獲得最高回報,但請查看這個自由的公司名單,其中獲得了高回報和堅實資產負債表的公司。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?對內容感到擔憂?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。