share_log

Clarivate (NYSE:CLVT) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Clarivate (NYSE:CLVT) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet

Clarivate(紐交所:CLVT)的資產負債表有些緊張。
Simply Wall St ·  07/24 15:47

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Clarivate Plc (NYSE:CLVT) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

李璐(Charlie Munger支持的)傳奇基金經理曾說:“最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是資本是否會永久損失。” 所以當您考慮股票風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,Clarivate Plc(NYSE:CLVT)確實負有債務。但股東們應該擔心它的債務使用嗎?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業發展的工具,但如果一家企業無法償還其債權人的債務,則將會處於其垂詢之下。最糟糕的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還其債權人,則可能破產。然而,更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以非常低的價格發行股份,永久性地稀釋股東,以支持其資產負債表。但是,常見的情況是,一家公司合理地管理其債務,並將其用於自己的利益。當我們審查債務水平時,首先要考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Clarivate's Debt?

Clarivate的債務情況是怎樣的?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Clarivate had US$4.63b of debt in March 2024, down from US$4.85b, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$350.4m, its net debt is less, at about US$4.28b.

您可以點擊下面的圖形查看歷史數據,但它顯示Clarivate在2024年3月有4630萬美元的債務,比一年前的4850萬美元下降。 但由於其有350.4萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,大約爲42.8億美元。

big
NYSE:CLVT Debt to Equity History July 24th 2024
NYSE:CLVT的資產負債率歷史記錄情況於2024年7月24日

How Strong Is Clarivate's Balance Sheet?

Clarivate的資產負債表有多強?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Clarivate had liabilities of US$1.61b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$5.00b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$350.4m and US$822.9m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$5.44b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

當我們關注最新的資產負債表數據時,我們可以看到Clarivate在12個月內有1.61億美元的負債,而後面有50億美元的負債。另一方面,它有350.4萬美元的現金和一年內到期的822.9萬美元的應收賬款。因此,其負債總額超過其現金和短期應收賬款的組合544億美元。

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$4.40b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

當您考慮到這種不足超過公司440億美元的市值時,您可能會傾向於認真審查資產負債表。假設,如果公司被迫以當前股價籌集資本來償還其負債,則需要大量稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

While Clarivate's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.3) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 0.94, suggesting high leverage. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. Fortunately, Clarivate grew its EBIT by 2.1% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Clarivate's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

雖然Clarivate的債務/息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率(4.3)表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息覆蓋率非常弱,爲0.94,表明槓桿率很高。在很大程度上,由於公司的重要折舊及攤銷費用,這意味着其EBITDA是盈利的非常慷慨的衡量標準,而其債務可能比首次出現的情況更爲沉重。顯然,借貸成本最近對股東的回報產生了負面影響。幸運的是,Clarivate去年EBIT增長了2.1%,相對於收益而言其債務縮減緩慢。毫無疑問,我們最多從資產負債表中了解債務。但未來的收益,而不是任何其他因素,將決定Clarivate維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的想法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的這份免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Clarivate actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用紙質利潤支付債務;它需要現金。因此,我們清楚地需要看看EBIT是否導致對應的自由現金流量。在過去的三年中,Clarivate實際上產生的自由現金流量比EBIT還要多。在保持與貸款人良好的關係時,沒有比進賬的現金更好的了。

Our View

我們的觀點

We'd go so far as to say Clarivate's interest cover was disappointing. But on the bright side, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Clarivate stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. Even though Clarivate lost money on the bottom line, its positive EBIT suggests the business itself has potential. So you might want to check out how earnings have been trending over the last few years.

我們認爲Clarivate的利息覆蓋率令人失望。但從好的一面看,它將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流量是一個好的跡象,讓我們更加樂觀。看到資產負債表並考慮所有這些因素,我們確實相信債務使Clarivate股票稍有風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們對潛在的風險問題難以預料,因此我們可能更希望股票負債更少。儘管Clarivate在底線上虧損,但其正面EBIT表明業務本身具有潛力。因此,您可能需要查看過去幾年的收益趨勢。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

總的來說,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包含這些公司(所有這些公司都有盈利增長的記錄)。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論