Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600521) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:600521) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Retail Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要見解
- Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- 42% of Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical is held by insiders
- 華海藥業的重要零售投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆股東的影響。
- 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
- 浙江華海藥業42%的股份由內部人士持有。
Every investor in Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600521) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
浙江華海藥業有關投資者應該了解持股最多的股東群體。持有公司最多數量股份的群體是零售投資者,精確地說是約47%。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或如果出現下行趨勢,將會損失最多的是該群體。
Following a 4.8% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but insiders who own 42% stock also took a hit.
上週股價下跌4.8%,零售投資者損失最大,但持有42%股份的內部人士也遭受了打擊。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東,以了解華海藥業的情況。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical?
機構股東在華海藥業的股份註冊表上已經存在。他們確實擁有相當大的股份,這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會誤判。如果多個機構同時改變其對股票的觀點,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看以下華海藥業的收益歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
浙江華海藥業已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,它們持有該公司可觀的股份。這意味着,爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過股票並喜歡它。但像任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查浙江華海藥業的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住有其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical. With a 25% stake, CEO Bao Hua Chen is the largest shareholder. Ming Hua Zhou is the second largest shareholder owning 15% of common stock, and China Merchants Fund Management Company Ltd. holds about 1.1% of the company stock.
對於浙江華海藥業,對沖基金持有的股票比較少。持有25%股份的首席執行官陳寶華是最大的股東,持有15%普通股的周明華是第二大股東,招商證券資產管理有限公司持有約1.1%的公司股票。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
通過股東登記簿我們可以看到,16個最大的股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical
一般的公衆(通常是個人投資者)持有浙江華海藥業45%的股份。儘管此股份所有權的規模可能不足以使政策決定朝着他們的方向轉變,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥10b stake in this CN¥24b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
似乎內部人士持有浙江華海藥業的相當比例。內部人士在這家240億元的公司中持有100億元的大量股份,這非常有趣。大多數人會認爲這顯示了與股東的很好的一致性,特別是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 47% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司47%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然該集團不能決定一切,但它肯定可以對公司的經營產生實質性影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical you should be aware of.
我特別關注公司的所有者是誰。但是要真正獲得啓示,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現了浙江華海藥業的2個警告信號,您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。