share_log

Pembina Vs. Brookfield Renewable: Which High-Yield Dividend Stock Is Better?

Pembina Vs. Brookfield Renewable: Which High-Yield Dividend Stock Is Better?

Pembina和brookfield renewable:哪個高收益紅利股票更好?
The Motley Fool ·  07/24 21:30
big

In the ever-evolving landscape of energy investments, dividend stocks remain a popular choice for long-term investors seeking stable income. In the Canadian market, Pembina Pipeline (TSX:PPL) and Brookfield Renewable Partners (TSX:BEP.UN) are two prominent energy dividend stocks. Today, let's get into them both, deciphering which stock might be a better long-term investment.

在不斷變化的能源投資領域,股息股仍然是尋求穩定收益的長期投資者的熱門選擇。在加拿大市場上,Pembina Pipeline (TSX:PPL) 和 Brookfield Renewable Partners (TSX:BEP.UN) 是兩隻備受關注的能源股息股。今天,讓我們一起了解它們,看看哪個股票可能是更好的長期投資。

Pembina Pipeline

Pembina Pipeline

Pembina Pipeline reported robust earnings for the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2023, with $698 million in earnings and a record annual adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) of $3.82 billion. Despite a slight miss in Q1 2024, the company remains financially strong, demonstrating consistent revenue and earnings growth.

Pembina Pipeline在2023年第四季度報告了強勁的業績,收益達到69800萬美元,年度調整後的利潤(EBITDA)創下了歷史紀錄,達到了38.2億美元。雖然在2024年Q1略有不足,但該公司仍然財力雄厚,展示了持續的營業收入和利潤增長。

Pembinaâs growth is driven by increased pipeline volumes, new contracts, and strategic acquisitions such as interests in Alliance and Aux Sable for $3.1 billion. Key projects like the Dallas path-to-zero initiative and the Nipisi pipeline further bolster its growth outlook.

Pembina的增長受到管道輸送量的增加、新合同以及戰略收購(如斥資31億美元收購Alliance和Aux Sable的股權)的推動。像達拉斯零排放計劃和Nipisi管道這樣的關鍵項目進一步提振了其增長前景。

The company is also known for its consistent dividend payouts, supported by its solid financial performance and strategic growth initiatives. This reliability makes it attractive for income-focused investors with a 5.7% dividend yield.

該公司以其可靠的財務表現和戰略增長舉措支持了連續的股息支付,這使其對具有5.7%股息收益的以收入爲重點的投資者非常有吸引力。

However, there are a few things to consider. Challenges include higher-than-expected capital costs for the Cedar LNG project and potential frac constraints. Even so, Pembinaâs strategic focus on new projects and acquisitions helps mitigate these risks.

但是,也有一些需要考慮的問題。其中包括Cedar LNG項目的資本成本高於預期和潛在的壓裂約束。即使如此,Pembina的新項目和收購的戰略重心有助於緩解這些風險。

Brookfield Renewable Partners

貝盧菲爾德可再生合夥公司

So, let's look at Brookfield Renewable as a comparison. The company reported revenue growth to $875 million in Q1 2024 but missed earnings estimates with an earnings per share of -$0.23. Despite this, the revenue increase reflects its expanding renewable energy portfolio.

那麼,讓我們將注意力轉向Brookfield Renewable。該公司在2024年Q1報告了收入增長至87500萬美元,但每股收益爲-0.23美元,未達到預期。儘管如此,收入增長反映了其不斷擴大的可再生能源組合。

Brookfield Renewable is positioned well in the renewable energy sector, with significant investments in solar, wind, and battery storage technologies. Strategic acquisitions, like Neoen, enhance its growth potential and market position. Plus, it offers partnerships with several other established companies.

Brookfield Renewable在可再生能源領域處於有利位置,擁有太陽能、風能和電池存儲技術的重要投資。像Neoen這樣的戰略收購增強了其增長潛力和市場地位。此外,它還爲多個成熟公司提供了夥伴關係。

Brookfield Renewable offers a competitive dividend yield, supported by stable cash flows from its diversified renewable energy assets. The companyâs commitment to sustainability and expanding projects adds to its long-term appeal. So, that dividend yield of 5.7% looks stable.

Brookfield Renewable提供有競爭力的股息收益,由其多樣化的可再生能源資產產生的穩定現金流支持。該公司致力於可持續發展和拓展項目,增加了其長期吸引力。因此,5.7%的股息收益看起來很穩定。

However, the primary risk is the recent earnings performance, with consistent misses against analyst estimates. Even so, the long-term growth potential in the renewable energy sector and strategic acquisitions provide a solid foundation for future performanceâ.

然而,主要風險在於公司近期的業績表現,未能達到分析師的預期。即使如此,在可再生能源領域的長期增長潛力和戰略收購爲未來業績奠定了堅實的基礎。

Bottom line

最後了結

Both Pembina Pipeline and Brookfield Renewable Partners offer attractive opportunities for long-term investors. Pembina Pipeline is ideal for those seeking stability and reliable dividends backed by strong financial performance and strategic growth in the energy sector. Meanwhile, Brookfield Renewable Partners appeals to investors focused on growth and sustainability, leveraging its expanding renewable energy portfolio and strategic acquisitions.

Pembina Pipeline和Brookfield Renewable Partners都爲長期投資者提供有吸引力的機會。對於那些尋求能源部門穩定股息、強大財務實力和戰略增長的人來說,Pembina Pipeline是理想的選擇。與此同時,Brookfield Renewable Partners適合專注於增長和可持續性的投資者,利用其不斷擴大的可再生能源組合和戰略性收購。無論如何,兩者都是多倫多證交所上強大的股息股。

Ultimately, the choice depends on individual investment goals and risk tolerance. Pembina offers more immediate financial stability and dividend reliability, while Brookfield Renewable provides long-term growth potential in the renewable energy market. Either way, both look like strong dividend stocks on the TSX today.

最終,選擇取決於個人的投資目標和風險承受能力。 Pembina提供更即時的財務穩定性和股息可靠性,而Brookfield Renewable提供在可再生能源市場中的長期增長潛力。無論哪種選擇,今天多倫多證交所上的兩個強大的股息股,都看起來不錯。

The post Pembina Vs. Brookfield Renewable: Which High-Yield Dividend Stock Is Better? appeared first on The Motley Fool Canada.

“Pembina Vs. Brookfield Renewable: Which High-Yield Dividend Stock Is Better?”的文章最先出現在加拿大Motley Fool。”

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論