share_log

Lower Capex Expected From Armada's JV Deal

Lower Capex Expected From Armada's JV Deal

Armada的合資協議預計將降低資本支出。
Business Today ·  07/24 23:23

ARMADA, through a 50:50 JV with UK-listed Navigator Holdings, has signed an MOU with international energy company Uniper (UK) Limited (Uniper) to explore liquid CO2 storage and carriers.

ARMADA通過與英國上市公司Navigator Holdings建立 50:50 的合資企業,與國際能源公司Uniper(英國)有限公司(Uniper)簽署了諒解備忘錄,探討液態二氧化碳的儲存和載體。

Kenanga said it believes the capex requirements will be lower than those of LNG projects and maintains its forecasts, TP of RM0.58 and MARKET PERFORM call.

凱南加表示,它認爲資本支出要求將低於液化天然氣項目的資本支出要求,並維持其預測,即0.58令吉的目標和Market PerForm看漲期權。

ARMADA and Navigator Holdings Ltd announced that Bluestreak CO2, their 50:50 JV established through a previously announced non-binding MOU, has entered into an MOU with Uniper. This collaboration will explore opportunities arising from the UK government's goal of decarbonizing the power sector by 2030.

ARMADA和Navigator Holdings Ltd宣佈,他們通過先前宣佈的不具約束力的諒解備忘錄成立的50:50 合資企業Bluestreak CO2已與Uniper簽訂了諒解備忘錄。這項合作將探索英國政府到2030年實現電力行業脫碳的目標所帶來的機遇。

Under the MOU, the parties will explore the feasibility of implementing a jetty-moored floating liquid CO2 storage facility and liquid CO2 carrier solution for the export of CO2 from Uniper's proposed Grain carbon capture project on the Isle of Grain, United Kingdom. While this is a positive development for ARMADA, it is still early to assess the economics of the CO2 projects.

根據諒解備忘錄,雙方將探討實施碼頭停泊的浮動液態二氧化碳儲存設施和液態二氧化碳載體解決方案的可行性,以便從Uniper提議的英國穀物碳捕集項目中出口二氧化碳。儘管這對ARMADA來說是一個積極的進展,但評估二氧化碳項目的經濟性還爲時過早。

The house said based on its channel checks, a CO2 carrier vessel could require a capex of USD100m-USD200m, while a floating storage unit could require USD100m-RM300m. However, ARMADA's final capex requirement will depend on the ownership structure of the potential assets. Kenanga said it believes the required capex will be lower than for LNG
projects of similar function (storage and carrier). However, the LNG industry is more mature than the CO2 industry. As a result, it believes the project carries less risk when executed in conjunction with its two partners.

該公司表示,根據其渠道檢查,一艘二氧化碳運輸船可能需要1萬美元.20000萬美元的資本支出,而浮動儲存單元可能需要1萬美元.30000萬令吉的資本支出。但是,ARMADA的最終資本支出要求將取決於潛在資產的所有權結構。凱南加說,它相信所需的資本支出將低於液化天然氣的資本支出
功能相似的項目(存儲和載體)。但是,液化天然氣行業比二氧化碳行業更爲成熟。因此,它認爲與兩個合作伙伴共同執行該項目所帶來的風險較小。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論