share_log

Institutional Investors in Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Lost 4.2% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Institutional Investors in Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) Lost 4.2% Last Week but Have Reaped the Benefits of Longer-term Growth

Aurora Innovation, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:AUR)的機構投資者上週下跌了4.2%,但已經從長期增長中受益
Simply Wall St ·  07/25 07:36

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Aurora Innovation's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • 15% of Aurora Innovation is held by insiders
  • 機構持股比例高意味着Aurora Innovation的股價易受到其交易行爲的影響。
  • 前6名股東持有公司51%的股份。
  • Aurora Innovation有15%的內部持股。

A look at the shareholders of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

分析Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ:AUR)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。持有最大部分股份的群體是擁有48%股份的機構。換句話說,該群體在公司的投資中有最大的收益(或虧損)風險。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.2% in value last week. Still, the 39% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中損失資金,特別是上週看到其持股價值下跌4.2%的機構投資者。但一年39%的增長可能有助於緩解他們的總體損失。然而,我們還是認爲他們會持續關注未來的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Aurora Innovation, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Aurora Innovation的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:AUR Ownership Breakdown July 25th 2024
NasdaqGS:AUR所有權結構於2024年7月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Aurora Innovation?

機構投資者對Aurora Innovation有一定比例的持股,這表明專業投資者對其有一定信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變其對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得看看Aurora Innovation下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Aurora Innovation. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Aurora Innovation's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Aurora Innovation中擁有相當一部分股份,這表明專業投資者對其有一定信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資決策,就像所有人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變其對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會快速下降。因此,值得看看Aurora Innovation下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:AUR Earnings and Revenue Growth July 25th 2024
納斯達克:AUR收益和營業收入增長於2024年7月25日

Aurora Innovation is not owned by hedge funds. Uber Technologies, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 21% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.4% by the third-largest shareholder. Christopher Urmson, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

Aurora Innovation並不屬於對沖基金,而是由Uber Technologies,Inc.擁有21%的流通股。就比較而言,第二大股東持有約9.4%的流通股,第三大股東持有約7.4%的流通股。同時,第二大股東Christopher Urmson也是首席執行官。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Aurora Innovation

關於Aurora Innovation的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Aurora Innovation, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$6.8b, and insiders have US$1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據表明,內部持有合理比例的Aurora Innovation, Inc.,市值僅爲68億美元,內部人士擁有價值10億美元的股票,這是相當重要的。看到他們投資有這個程度非常令人欣慰。您可以在這裏檢查看看那些內部人士是否最近有買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Aurora Innovation. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有10%,主要由散戶組成的普通公衆在Aurora Innovation中具有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益上改變政策決定,但他們仍然能夠對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 26% of Aurora Innovation. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

我們認爲,公共公司擁有Aurora Innovation的26%股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的商業利益。這可能是他們進行拆分的原因。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Aurora Innovation better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Aurora Innovation you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

始終考慮持有一家公司股份的不同群體是值得的。但要更好地了解Aurora Innovation,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們發現了Aurora Innovation的四個預警信號,其中有一個令人有些擔憂。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論