After Losing 4.3% in the Past Year, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain
After Losing 4.3% in the Past Year, Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Ingles Markets implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 安格萊斯市場的機構大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響。
- 前六大股東持有該業務的50%股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
A look at the shareholders of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (NASDAQ:IMKT.A) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
查看Ingles Markets, Incorporated (納斯達克:IMKt.A)的股東,可以看出哪個團體最具影響力。我們可以看出,機構擁有該公司的大部分股權,持有64%。換句話說,該團體將從自己對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)。
Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 3.9% increase in the share price after a year of 4.3% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.
機構投資者可能會歡迎上週股價上漲3.9%的消息,這是在一年4.3%的虧損後回升的跡象,表明投資回報率可能會開始上升。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ingles Markets, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Ingles Markets的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ingles Markets?
機構持股情況告訴我們有關Ingles Markets的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ingles Markets. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ingles Markets, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在安格萊斯市場擁有相當多的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師看過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者在同時嘗試拋售某個股票,股價下跌很多是很常見的。因此,值得注意的是,檢查安格萊斯市場的過去盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ingles Markets. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Robert Ingle with 22% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Dimensional Fund Advisors LP and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 6.2%.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會很可能要關注他們的偏好。對安格萊斯市場,對沖基金沒有多少股份。從數據來看,最大的股東是羅伯特·英格爾,持有22%的流通股份。第二大和第三大股東是Dimensional Fund Advisors LP和BlackRock, Inc.,他們的股份持有量相等,爲6.2%。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Ingles Markets
安格萊斯市場的內部股權擁有情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Ingles Markets, Incorporated. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.5b, and insiders have US$324m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,安格萊斯市場,Incorporated的內部人士擁有相當大的股份。它的市值只有15億美元,內部人員擁有3,240萬美元的股份。這相當顯著。大多數人會說,這表明該公司內部人員在股東方面擁有相當程度的一致性,特別是在這樣一個規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的13%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然該群體不能決定,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Ingles Markets that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,在投資這裏之前,我們發現了1個有關安格萊斯市場的警告信號。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。