share_log

After the Recent Decline, Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478) Top Key Executive Ningning He's Holdings Have Lost 12% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478) Top Key Executive Ningning He's Holdings Have Lost 12% of Their Value

最近下跌後,Q科技(集團)有限公司(HKG:1478)的重要高管何寧寧的持股價值已經下跌了12%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/27 20:42

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Q Technology (Group)'s significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 64% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Ningning He)
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • Q科技(集團)的重要內部所有權表明其在公司擴張方面具有固有利益。
  • 該公司64%的股份由一位單一股東(何寧寧)持有。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Q Technology (Group) Company Limited (HKG:1478), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 64% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制Q科技(集團)有限公司(HKG:1478),那麼您需要觀察其股份登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,個人內部人員擁有公司的絕大部分股權,佔有64%的股權。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As market cap fell to HK$5.1b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

隨着市值上週跌至HK $ 5.1億,內部人員將面臨比公司其他股東群體更高的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Q Technology (Group).

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Q科技(集團)的不同所有權群體。

big
SEHK:1478 Ownership Breakdown July 28th 2024
SEHK:1478所有權分佈2024年7月28日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Q Technology (Group)?

機構持股關於Q科技(集團)的提示是什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Q Technology (Group) does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Q Technology (Group)'s earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Q Technology(Group)確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經查看了該股票並且他們很喜歡它。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,則可以看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Q Technology(Group)下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SEHK:1478 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 28th 2024
SEHK:1478 於2024年7月28日發佈營業收入和收益增長報告。

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Q Technology (Group). Our data suggests that Ningning He, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 64%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.6% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 1.3% of the company stock.

對沖基金在Q Technology(Group)的股份不多。我們的數據表明,公司的首席關鍵執行官何寧寧持有最多數量的股份,達到64%。當內部人員持有公司的大量股票時,投資者認爲這是一個積極的信號,因爲這表明內部人員願意將自己的財富與公司的未來聯繫起來。Harvest Fund Management Co. Ltd.是持有1.6%普通股的第二大股東,The Vanguard Group,Inc.持有該公司股票的約1.3%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Q Technology (Group)

Q科技(集團)的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Q Technology (Group) Company Limited. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own HK$3.2b worth of shares in the HK$5.1b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人員擁有Q Technology(Group)有限公司超過一半的股份。這使他們對公司擁有有效的控制權。這意味着他們在HK $ 51億公司中擁有價值HK $ 32億的股份。這是非常有意義的。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Q Technology (Group). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有Q Technology(Group)的29%股份。雖然該集團不能必然掌控公司,但它肯定可以對公司的經營方式產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Q Technology (Group) has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,需要考慮風險-我們認爲Q Technology(Group)存在3個警告信號,您應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論