share_log

Private Equity Firms Are Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603567) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥517m

Private Equity Firms Are Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603567) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥517m

股權投資公司是珍寶島藥業股份有限公司(SHSE:603567)的最大股東,在市值下跌5.17億元后受到重創。
Simply Wall St ·  07/29 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • Heilongjiang Chuangda Group Co., Ltd. owns 50% of the company
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 珍寶島製藥的重要的股權投資公司持股表明,其關鍵決策受到來自大衆股東的影響。
  • 黑龍江創達集團有限公司擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603567), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private equity firms with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着黑龍江珍寶島製藥股份有限公司(SHSE:603567),那麼你就得看一下它的股權登記簿構成。掌握市場最大份額的是持有55%股權的股權投資公司。換句話說,該組織從其投資中獲得或損失的最多。

As a result, private equity firms as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥517m.

因此,在市值下降了51700萬的情況下,作爲一個整體,股權投資公司遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對於黑龍江珍寶島製藥能告訴我們些什麼。

big
SHSE:603567 Ownership Breakdown July 29th 2024
SHSE:603567所有權分解2024年7月29日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical?

機構所有權對珍寶島製藥有何影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,珍寶島製藥確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時候也會犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某一隻股票,股價暴跌也是很常見的情況。因此,值得檢查珍寶島製藥的過去收益軌跡(見下文) 。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SHSE:603567 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 29th 2024
SHSE:603567收益和營業收入增長2024年7月29日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical. Heilongjiang Chuangda Group Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對於珍寶島製藥,對沖基金在其中沒有意義性的投資。黑龍江創達集團有限公司是目前該公司持股最多的股東,擁有50%的流通股份。這意味着他們對該公司的未來有絕對的控制權。作爲背景,第二大股東持有流通股份的約5.9%,第三大股東持有5.0%的股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。

Insider Ownership Of Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical

珍寶島製藥的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥6.4m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據表明,珍寶島製藥股份有限公司的內部人員持股比例不到1%。但他們可能通過我們沒有注意到的公司架構間接持有利益。它是一家大型公司,因此即使是小比例的持股也足以創造董事會和股東之間的一致性。在這種情況下,內部人員擁有價值640萬人民幣的股票。看到至少擁有一些內部所有權總是好的,但我們可能需要檢查那些內部人員是否一直在賣股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆 - 包括散戶投資者 - 持有公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然此種持股規模可能不足以在他們的利益中左右決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 55%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

持有55%的股權投資公司在塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面處於一個位置。有時我們會看到私募股權投資長揸,但總的來說,他們的投資時間較短,並且如其名稱所示,不會在公共公司中投資太多。一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售並重新部署資本。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.2%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司股份的6.2%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時,內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份來參與公共公司。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Heilongjiang ZBD Pharmaceutical (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮到擁有一家公司的不同集團值得深思,但還有其他更重要的因素需要考慮。例如,不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了2個警示信號,其中至少1個不應被忽視,了解它們應該是您的投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論