share_log

Sealand Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000750) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 49% Stake, While 37% Is Held by Private Companies

Sealand Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:000750) Top Owners Are Retail Investors With 49% Stake, While 37% Is Held by Private Companies

國海證券(SZSE:000750)的最大股東爲零售投資者,持股比例達49%,而37%的股份由私營企業持有。
Simply Wall St ·  07/29 21:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Sealand Securities' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 國海證券的重要零售投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。

Every investor in Sealand Securities Co., Ltd. (SZSE:000750) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 49% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

深交所:000750的所有投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。 持有最大份額的群體是零售投資者,佔比49%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,則該群體將受益最多(如果出現衰退,則損失最多)。

Meanwhile, private companies make up 37% of the company's shareholders.

同時,私人公司佔公司股東的37%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sealand Securities.

在下圖中,我們將放大介紹國海證券的不同股權代表。

big
SZSE:000750 Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
深交所000750所有權結構拆分 2024年7月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sealand Securities?

機構投資者持股情況給國海證券告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Sealand Securities already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sealand Securities, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

國海證券已經有股權機構了。確實,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是警惕依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,則看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此值得檢查國海證券的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SZSE:000750 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
深交所000750營收增長 2024年7月30日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sealand Securities. The company's largest shareholder is Guangxi Investment Group Co.,Ltd, with ownership of 30%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對國海證券的Hedge Fund並沒有意義的投資。該公司最大的股東是廣西產業投資集團有限公司,持有30%的股份。爲了方便起見,第二大股東持有約4.4%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.8%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔細觀察我們的股權拆分數據表明,前15大股東持有的股權總和爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of Sealand Securities

國海證券的內部股權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.

看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 49% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

私人公司持有濰柴動力股票的比例爲19%。可能值得更深入地研究這個問題。如果相關方,例如內部人,在其中一個私人公司中持有股份,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能也對該公司具有戰略利益。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 37%, of the Sealand Securities stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

看起來私人公司擁有國海證券股票的37%。單憑這個事實很難得出什麼結論,因此值得調查這些私人公司的所有者是誰。有時內部人員或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司在公共公司中持有股票。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 7.1% of Sealand Securities. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們認爲公共公司佔國海證券的7.1%。很難說是股份戰略性持股,因此值得關注所有權的變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Sealand Securities (of which 1 is concerning!) you should know about.

檢查一個公司的股東,我覺得這非常有趣。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了Sealand Securities的4個警告信號(其中1個令人關注!),您應該知道它們。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論