share_log

Is PCCW (HKG:8) A Risky Investment?

Is PCCW (HKG:8) A Risky Investment?

電訊盈科(HKG:8)是否是一項高風險投資?
Simply Wall St ·  2024/07/30 12:27

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that PCCW Limited (HKG:8) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特著名地說:“波動性與風險遠非同義詞。” 當您審查企業的風險時,考慮公司的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲當企業倒閉時,通常相關涉及債務。我們可以看到電訊盈科(adr) (HKG:8)的業務中使用了負債,但更重要的問題是:這些負債產生了多少風險?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助公司讓業務運轉,直到公司有困難支付新資本或自由現金流之前。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所有。雖然這不是很常見的情況,我們經常看到負債公司因爲貸款人強迫其以困境價位籌集資本而使股東永久稀釋。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理管理其債務並從中獲益。在考慮公司債務水平時的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is PCCW's Net Debt?

PCCW的淨負債是什麼?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, PCCW had HK$56.1b of debt, up from HK$51.5b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have HK$2.14b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about HK$54.0b.

如下所示,截至2024年6月底,電訊盈科(adr)的債務總額爲561億港元,較一年前的515億港元增加。點擊圖像以獲取更多詳細信息。然而,該公司持有21.4億港元的現金,用於衝抵負債,因此淨債務約爲540億港元。

big
SEHK:8 Debt to Equity History July 30th 2024
SEHK:8負債股本歷史 2024年7月30日

A Look At PCCW's Liabilities

查看電訊盈科(adr)的負債

According to the last reported balance sheet, PCCW had liabilities of HK$23.5b due within 12 months, and liabilities of HK$65.8b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had HK$2.14b in cash and HK$5.34b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by HK$81.8b.

根據最新披露的資產負債表,電訊盈科(adr)在未來12個月內需要償還235億港元的負債,並需要償還超過12個月的負債658億港元。抵銷負債的是,它在未來12個月內有21.4億港元現金和53.4億港元的應收賬款。因此,其負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款總和的818億港元。

This deficit casts a shadow over the HK$30.8b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, PCCW would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.

這種赤字對這家價值308億港元的公司產生了嚴重影響,就像一個龐然大物屹立於平民之上。因此,毫無疑問,我們會密切關注其資產負債表。最終,如果其債權人要求償還,電訊盈科可能需要進行重大資本重組。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Weak interest cover of 2.0 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.3 hit our confidence in PCCW like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. However, one redeeming factor is that PCCW grew its EBIT at 10% over the last 12 months, boosting its ability to handle its debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PCCW's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

2.0倍的薄弱利息保障倍數和5.3倍的高淨債務/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤比率使我們對電訊盈科(adr)的信懇智能有所打擊。在這裏,負債負擔相當重。但是,一個可贖回的因素是,電訊盈科在過去12個月中將EBIT增長了10%,提高了其應對債務的能力。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解最多的是負債。但更重要的是未來的收入,這將決定電訊盈科維護健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的意見,您可能會發現這份免費的分析師利潤預測報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, PCCW generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 84% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,公司只能用實實在在的現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,我們明確需要觀察的是EBIT是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,電訊盈科實現的自由現金流總額相當可觀,約爲其EBIT的84%,超出我們的預期。如果需要,這將使其有能力償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, PCCW's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Once we consider all the factors above, together, it seems to us that PCCW's debt is making it a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for PCCW (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

就表面而言,電訊盈科的淨債務/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤比率讓我們對其股票持有觀望態度,並且其總負債水平並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚只有一個空飯館更具吸引力。但至少它在將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流方面表現得相當不錯;這令人鼓舞。在考慮以上所有因素時,我們認爲電訊盈科的債務正在使其變得有些冒險。這並不一定是壞事,但我們通常會更喜歡較少的債務槓桿比率。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解最多的是負債。但是,最終,每個公司都可能帶有超出資產負債表之外的風險。這些風險難以發現。每個公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現電訊盈科存在三個警示:其中有一個不能忽視!您應該知道。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論