share_log

Individual Investors Own 40% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754) Shares but Private Companies Control 45% of the Company

Individual Investors Own 40% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754) Shares but Private Companies Control 45% of the Company

個人投資者擁有上海錦江國際酒店股份有限公司(SHSE:600754)40%的股份,但私營企業控制公司的45%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/30 18:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • 15% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels is held by Institutions
  • 上海錦江國際酒店的重要私營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到大衆股東的影響。
  • 共有5位投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,持股比例爲50%。
  • 上海錦江國際酒店15%的股份由機構持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600754), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 45% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解上海錦江國際酒店股份有限公司(SHSE:600754)真正的控制人,了解公司的所有權結構非常重要。持有最大股份的是佔45%的私人公司。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最大(或者在經濟衰退時損失最大)。

And individual investors on the other hand have a 40% ownership in the company.

而個人投資者則持有該公司的40%股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels.

在下圖中,我們放大了上海錦江國際酒店的不同所有權群體。

big
SHSE:600754 Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
SHSE:600754所有權分配2024年7月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels?

機構所有權告訴我們關於上海錦江國際酒店的什麼?上海錦江國際酒店已經有機構股東。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所提供的所謂驗證。他們也會有錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查上海錦江國際酒店的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

上海錦江國際酒店已經有機構股東。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所提供的所謂驗證。他們也會有錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,往往會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查上海錦江國際酒店的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
SHSE:600754 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
SHSE:600754收益和營業收入增長2024年7月30日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels. Our data shows that Jinjiang International Holdings Co.,Ltd is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 1.5% and 1.4% of the stock.

對於上海錦江國際酒店,對沖基金並沒有持有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,錦江國際控股有限公司是持有45%流通股份的最大股東。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約1.5%和1.4%的股份。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels

上海錦江國際酒店的內部所有權我們的數據表明,內部人以自己的名字擁有上海錦江國際酒店股份有限公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們沒有察覺到的公司結構具有間接利益。這是一家相當大的公司,所以董事會成員可能擁有公司中有意義的利益,而不必擁有成比例的利益。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約220萬人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。可以點擊這裏查看最近的買賣情況。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Co., Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around CN¥2.2m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有上海錦江國際酒店40%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能掌控局面,但它肯定會對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 40% stake in Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體是值得的。但爲了更好地了解上海錦江國際酒店,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該知道我們發現的2個警告信號與上海錦江國際酒店有關。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 45%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

思考擁有公司股份的不同機構總是值得的。但要更好地了解華峯化學有限公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如:我們已經發現華峯化學有限公司的1個警示信號,你需要了解。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels .

始終考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體是值得的。但爲了更好地了解上海錦江國際酒店,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該知道我們發現的2個警告信號與上海錦江國際酒店有關。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論