share_log

Individual Investors in CSSC Science& Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:600072) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 3.3% Last Week

Individual Investors in CSSC Science& Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:600072) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 3.3% Last Week

個人投資者是中國船舶科技股份有限公司(SHSE:600072)最大的賭徒,他們的賭注得到了回報,股票上週上漲了3.3%
Simply Wall St ·  07/30 18:33

Key Insights

主要見解

  • CSSC Science& Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 6 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • 19% of CSSC Science& Technology is held by Institutions
  • CSSC科技的重要個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到來自大衆股東的影響。
  • 前6大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 19%的CSSC科技股份被機構持有。

A look at the shareholders of CSSC Science& Technology Co., Ltd (SHSE:600072) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 41% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下CSSC科技股份有哪些股東,就可以判斷哪個群體最強大了。最大的股東群體是個人投資者,持有41%的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上升空間(或下跌風險)。

Clearly, individual investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by CN¥618m last week.

很明顯,上週該公司的市值上漲了6,1800萬元,讓個人投資者獲得了最多的利益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CSSC Science& Technology.

讓我們更近距離地觀察一下不同類型的股東對CSSC科技的影響。

big
SHSE:600072 Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
SHSE:600072所有權結構於2024年7月30日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSSC Science& Technology?

CSSC科技的機構持股情況說明了什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that CSSC Science& Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of CSSC Science& Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,CSSC科技確實擁有機構投資者,且他們持有公司的相當大部分股票。這表明該公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,我們最好不要過於依賴來自機構投資者的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時賣出一隻股票,很常見導致股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查一下CSSC科技的過去收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,還要記住有其他因素需要考慮。

big
SHSE:600072 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
SHSE:600072的盈利和營業收入增長於2024年7月30日

CSSC Science& Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited is the largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

CSSC科技並不是由對沖基金持有的。我們的數據顯示,中國船舶重工股份有限公司持有34%的流通股份。爲了更好的理解,第二大股東持有大約4%的流通股份,第三大股東持有3.8%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更深入的研究,並發現前六大股東持有約50%的股份登記簿,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在某種程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of CSSC Science& Technology

CSSC科技的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我們的數據無法確認董事會成員個人持有股份。由於我們不能獲悉內部持股情況,因此可能存在缺失數據。因此,評估首席執行官的報酬和任期很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 41% stake in CSSC Science& Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常,佔股比例達到41%的公衆股東是個人投資者。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以影響他們的決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 38%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司38%的股份。這或許值得進一步研究。如果相關方(如內部人士)對其中一傢俬有公司有利益,那麼這應該在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司具有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with CSSC Science& Technology (at least 3 which are concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我認爲查看一家公司的所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息,比如不斷存在的投資風險。我們已經識別出CSSC科技的4個警告信號(至少有3個令人擔憂),了解這些信號應該是你的投資過程的一部分。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論