share_log

Is Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) A Risky Investment?

Is Duke Energy (NYSE:DUK) A Risky Investment?

杜克能源(紐交所:DUK)是一項風險投資嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 11:51

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

傳奇基金經理李錄(受查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:“最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是是否會遭受資本永久損失。”當你考慮一家公司的風險時,考慮其資產負債表是再自然不過的了,因爲當一家企業崩潰時通常會涉及到債務。重要的是,杜克能源公司(紐交所:DUK)確實承擔了債務。但是這個債務會對股東產生影響嗎?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有當公司無法輕鬆地償還債務(通過籌集資本或使用自有現金流)時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸方可以接管企業。然而,更常見的(但仍然很昂貴)情況是公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東,以控制債務。當然,債務對於企業來說也可以是一個重要的工具,特別是資本投入高的企業。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先關注現金和債務的總和。

How Much Debt Does Duke Energy Carry?

杜克能源承擔了多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of March 2024 Duke Energy had US$81.4b of debt, an increase on US$76.2b, over one year. Net debt is about the same, since the it doesn't have much cash.

你可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但是可以看到截至2024年3月,杜克能源的債務總額爲814億美元,較去年增加了76.2億美元。由於它沒有太多現金,淨債務大致相同。

big
NYSE:DUK Debt to Equity History July 31st 2024
紐交所:DUK債務與權益歷史記錄2024年7月31日

How Healthy Is Duke Energy's Balance Sheet?

杜克能源的資產負債表看起來怎麼樣?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Duke Energy had liabilities of US$15.5b due within a year, and liabilities of US$112.5b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$459.0m as well as receivables valued at US$3.90b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$123.7b.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,杜克能源負有1.55億美元的短期債務和1,125億美元的長期債務。抵消這些義務的是,它擁有4.59億美元的現金,以及12個月內到期的39億美元的應收賬款。因此,它的負債超過現金和(短期)應收款項的總和約123.7億美元。

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's huge US$83.9b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.

考慮到這個逆差超過了公司巨大的839億美元的市值,你可能會傾向於密切關注杜克能源的資產負債表。在公司不得不迅速清理資產負債表的情況下,股東似乎很可能會遭受嚴重股權稀釋。

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。

Weak interest cover of 2.4 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.9 hit our confidence in Duke Energy like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. On a slightly more positive note, Duke Energy grew its EBIT at 12% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Duke Energy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

2.4倍的弱利息覆蓋率和5.9倍的惡劣淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤比使我們對杜克能源的信心受到了致命的打擊。這意味着我們認爲它的債務負擔很重。稍微樂觀一點的是,過去一年中,杜克能源的息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤增長了12%,進一步增強了它管理債務的能力。顯然,在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定杜克能源能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。所以,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告,顯示分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. Over the last three years, Duke Energy saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.

最後,儘管稅務部門可能非常喜歡會計利潤,但債權人只接受現金。因此,合乎邏輯的做法是查看與實際自由現金流匹配的EBIt的比例。在過去的三年中,杜克能源出現了相當大的負自由現金流。雖然這可能是爲了增長的開支,但它確實使得債務更加冒險。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Duke Energy's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least it's pretty decent at growing its EBIT; that's encouraging. It's also worth noting that Duke Energy is in the Electric Utilities industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Taking into account all the aforementioned factors, it looks like Duke Energy has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Duke Energy you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

從表面上看,杜克能源的淨債務與息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤讓我們對股票充滿疑慮,而它將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力與最繁忙的一年中最空的餐廳的樣子相同。但至少它的息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤增長相當不錯,這是令人鼓舞的。此外,值得注意的是,杜克能源處於公用事業行業,這通常被認爲是相當具有防禦性的。綜合考慮所有上述因素,杜克能源看起來負債過多。儘管一些投資者喜歡這種風險較大的投資,但這肯定不是我們的菜。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解到負債方面的大部分內容。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,這是與資產負債表完全不同的。證據就是:我們發現杜克能源有3個警示信號,你應該意識到其中1個並有點擔心。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論