share_log

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 76%

在機構投資者中,愛默生電氣公司(紐交所:EMR)是一個受歡迎的選擇,他們持有76%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 11:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Emerson Electric's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 45% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持股顯著高表示艾默生電氣的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前25大股東佔45%的業務。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想要知道真正控制紐交所上市公司艾默生電氣股份的人,那麼你需要查看其股份登記表的構成情況。持有該公司76%股份的是機構股東,該群體在股票上漲時最有可能受益(或在股票下跌時最有可能虧損)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Emerson Electric, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解艾默生電氣的每一種所有者,從下圖開始。

big
NYSE:EMR Ownership Breakdown July 31st 2024
2014年7月31日紐交所上市公司艾默生電氣所有權分佈情況。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?

機構持有是什麼告訴我們關於艾默生電氣的情況?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Emerson Electric does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到艾默生電氣回購了一部分公司股份,而且其股份中有相當一部分是由機構投資者持有的。這表明在專業投資者中艾默生電氣具有一定的可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時候機構和每個人一樣也會做出錯誤的投資。如果多個機構同時改變對某支股票的看法,股價就可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得一提的是艾默生電氣以下的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:EMR Earnings and Revenue Growth July 31st 2024
2014年7月31日紐交所上市公司艾默生電氣的收益率和營業收入增長情況。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Emerson Electric. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.1% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者持有公司的50%以上股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響公司董事會的決策。對於艾默生電氣而言,對沖基金的持股量不多。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有該公司9.1%的流通股。值得一提的是,第二大股東持有約6.2%的流通股,而第三大股東持有4.2%的流通股。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric

艾默生電氣的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$252m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息表明,艾默生電氣公司內部人員持有該公司不到1%的股份。由於其體量如此大,我們不希望內部人員持有大量的股份。研究顯示,他們共持有25200萬美元的股份。董事會成員擁有股份是一件好事,但最好檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 23% stake in Emerson Electric. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆持有艾默生電氣23%的股份,他們通常是個體投資者。儘管這個群體不能決策,但他們可以在公司的運營方面發揮真正的影響力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Emerson Electric that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有某家公司的不同群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現艾默生電氣有1個警告信號,你應該知道這一點。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論