The Three-year Shareholder Returns and Company Earnings Persist Lower as Raffles Medical Group (SGX:BSL) Stock Falls a Further 7.8% in Past Week
The Three-year Shareholder Returns and Company Earnings Persist Lower as Raffles Medical Group (SGX:BSL) Stock Falls a Further 7.8% in Past Week
For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But in any portfolio, there are likely to be some stocks that fall short of that benchmark. We regret to report that long term Raffles Medical Group Ltd (SGX:BSL) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 34% in three years, versus a market decline of about 13%. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 29% in the last year. And the share price decline continued over the last week, dropping some 7.8%. Importantly, this could be a market reaction to the recently released financial results. You can check out the latest numbers in our company report.
對於許多投資者來說,股票選擇的主要目的是獲得比整個市場更高的回報。但是在任何投資組合中,可能會出現一些未達到該基準的股票。我們很遺憾地報道說,長揸萊佛士醫療集團有限公司(新加坡交易所:BSL)股票的股東已經有了這種經歷,股價在三年內下跌了34%,而市場下跌了約13%。而最近的買家過得也很艱難,過去一年股價下跌了29%。並且股價下跌的趨勢在上週繼續,下跌了7.8%。重要的是,這可能是對最近發佈的財務業績的市場反應。您可以在我們的公司報告中查看最新數據。
After losing 7.8% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.
在過去一週下跌了7.8%之後,值得研究該公司的基本面,看看我們可以從過去的表現中推斷出什麼。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
雖然市場是一個強大的定價機制,但股價反映了投資者情緒,不僅僅是基本業績。一種有缺陷但合理的評估公司周圍情緒如何變化的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
Raffles Medical Group saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 12% per year, over the last three years. This change in EPS is reasonably close to the 13% average annual decrease in the share price. So it seems like sentiment towards the stock hasn't changed all that much over time. In this case, it seems that the EPS is guiding the share price.
萊佛士醫療集團過去三年每年的每股收益以複合比率下降了12%,與股價每年平均下降13%的差距相當接近。所以看起來對股票的看法在很長時間內並沒有改變。在這種情況下,EPS似乎正在引導股價。
The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖顯示了EPS隨時間變化的情況(點擊圖像以顯示確切值)。
It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Raffles Medical Group's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很高興看到在過去三個月中有一些重要的內部買盤。這是一個積極的跡象。儘管如此,我們認爲盈利和收入增長趨勢更是要考慮的重要因素。通過查看萊佛士醫療集團的收益,收入和現金流的交互式圖表來深入了解收益情況。
What About Dividends?
那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. In the case of Raffles Medical Group, it has a TSR of -29% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
除了衡量股價回報之外,投資者還應考慮總股東回報(TSR)。股價回報只反映股價的變化,TSR包括股息的價值(假設它們被重新投資)和任何折價的資本籌集或拆分的利益。因此,對於分紅慷慨的公司,TSR往往比股價回報高得多。在萊佛士醫療集團的情況下,過去3年其TSR爲-29%。這超過了我們之前提到的股價回報。毫無疑問,股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種差異!
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
Raffles Medical Group shareholders are down 27% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 3.8%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 1.3% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Raffles Medical Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Raffles Medical Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
萊佛士醫療集團的股東在今年(包括分紅)總計虧損27%,但市場本身上漲了3.8%。即使是好股票的股價有時也會下跌,但在過於關注基本業務指標之前,我們要看到企業的基本業務指標得到改善。長期股東賺錢的好處是經過了半個多世紀的處理,收益增長趨勢的跡象值得一看。追蹤股價的長期表現總是很有趣的。但是要更好地了解萊佛士醫療集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,始終存在的投資風險的問題。我們已經識別出了萊佛士醫療集團的1個警告信號,並且了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Raffles Medical Group is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find lesser know companies this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.
萊佛士醫療集團並不是內部人士正在購買的唯一股票。對於那些喜歡尋找不知名公司的人,這個免費的增長公司列表有最近進行內部購買的公司,可能是一個不錯的選擇。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.
請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在新加坡交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。