Retail Investors Invested in Hangzhou Freely Communication Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603602) up 15% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Retail Investors Invested in Hangzhou Freely Communication Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603602) up 15% Last Week, Insiders Too Were Rewarded
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Hangzhou Freely Communication indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
- 40% of Hangzhou Freely Communication is held by insiders
- 縱橫通信的零售投資者擁有大量股權,這意味着他們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
- 前25大股東擁有該公司47%的股份。
- 縱橫通信有40%的股權由內部人持有。
Every investor in Hangzhou Freely Communication Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603602) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
每位投資縱橫通信有限公司(SHSE:603602)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。擁有最大餅圖的群體是佔有53%股權的零售投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下滑,損失最多)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥2.8b last week, while insiders who own 40% also benefitted.
零售投資者在上週市值達到28億人民幣後獲得了最大收益,而持有40%股份的內部人士也受益。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hangzhou Freely Communication.
讓我們仔細看看,不同類型的股東對縱橫通信有什麼告訴我們的。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hangzhou Freely Communication?
機構所有權告訴我們有關縱橫通信的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Hangzhou Freely Communication. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
機構在縱橫通信持有的股份非常少。這表明公司吸引了一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。如果公司盈利增長,這可能表明它剛開始引起這些大型投資者的注意。有時候我們會看到股價上漲,當幾家大型機構同時想買入某支股票時。下面您可以看到盈利和營業收入的歷史數據,這在考慮更多機構投資者是否想要這支股票時可能會有幫助。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Hangzhou Freely Communication. Our data shows that Wei Feng Su is the largest shareholder with 30% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 4.0% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
在縱橫通信中,對沖基金並不擁有很多股份。我們的數據顯示,蘇偉峯是最大的股東,持有30%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的4.0%和2.7%。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的一種好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。我們目前沒有注意到該股票的任何分析師報告,因此該公司不大可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Hangzhou Freely Communication
縱橫通信的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hangzhou Freely Communication Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥2.8b, and insiders have CN¥1.1b worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人員擁有杭州縱橫通信有限公司的合理比例。它的市值僅爲28億人民幣,內部人員擁有11億人民幣的股份。看到內部人員對業務的投資如此之高是很好的。值得注意的是,可能值得查看這些內部人員近期是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 53% of Hangzhou Freely Communication. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
普通投資者 - 包括零售投資者 - 擁有杭州縱橫通信53%的股份。在這種所有權比例下,零售投資者可以共同參與影響股東回報的決策,例如分紅政策和董事任命。他們還可以行使對可能不會提高盈利能力的收購或合併進行投票的權力。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hangzhou Freely Communication better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Hangzhou Freely Communication .
總是值得考慮公司的不同股東群體。但要更好地了解縱橫通信,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的3個縱橫通信的警告信號。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。