share_log

Wilmar International (SGX:F34) Shareholders Have Endured a 20% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Wilmar International (SGX:F34) Shareholders Have Endured a 20% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Wilmar International(新加坡交易所:F34)的股東在三年前的投資中遭受了20%的損失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/31 19:52

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. We regret to report that long term Wilmar International Limited (SGX:F34) shareholders have had that experience, with the share price dropping 30% in three years, versus a market decline of about 13%.

許多投資者認爲,在長期內打敗市場平均水平是成功的投資。但是幾乎可以肯定的是,有時您會購買的股票表現不及市場平均回報。我們遺憾地報告,新加坡交易所上的威廉國際有限公司(SGX:F34)的長期股東正在經歷這種經歷,股價在三年內下跌了30%,而市場下降了約13%。

So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那麼我們來看看這家公司的長期表現是否符合其業務進展情況。

To paraphrase Benjamin Graham: Over the short term the market is a voting machine, but over the long term it's a weighing machine. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

引用本傑明·格雷厄姆的話:短期內市場是一個投票機,但長期來看它是一個稱重機。評估公司周邊環境的情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。

Although the share price is down over three years, Wilmar International actually managed to grow EPS by 0.4% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

雖然威廉國際的股價在三年內下跌了,但其EPS在此期間實際上增長了0.4%。考慮到股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑EPS在此期間並不是業務表現的良好指南(可能是由於一次性損失或收益),或者過去的增長預期可能是不合理的。

After considering the numbers, we'd posit that the the market had higher expectations of EPS growth, three years back. However, taking a look at other business metrics might shed a bit more light on the share price action.

在考慮了有關數字之後,我們認爲市場對EPS增長的預期在三年前更高。但是,查看其他業務指標可能會更加了解股價行情。

Given the healthiness of the dividend payments, we doubt that they've concerned the market. We like that Wilmar International has actually grown its revenue over the last three years. If the company can keep growing revenue, there may be an opportunity for investors. You might have to dig deeper to understand the recent share price weakness.

考慮到分紅派息的健康狀況,我們懷疑他們沒有引起市場的關注。我們喜歡威廉國際在過去三年中實際上增長了營業收入。如果公司能夠繼續增長營業收入,投資者就有機會。您可能需要深入挖掘,了解最近股價疲軟的原因。

You can see how earnings and revenue have changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

你可以在下面的圖片中看到收入和營業收入隨時間的變化情況(單擊圖表可查看精確值)。

big
SGX:F34 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 31st 2024
SGX:F34的收益和營收增長於2024年7月31日

It's good to see that there was some significant insider buying in the last three months. That's a positive. That said, we think earnings and revenue growth trends are even more important factors to consider. This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on Wilmar International

看到上個季度有些重要的內部買入是好事。儘管如此,我們認爲盈利和營收增長趨勢更加重要。此免費報告顯示分析師預測,應該能幫助您形成有關威廉國際的觀點。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Wilmar International the TSR over the last 3 years was -20%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments!

考慮到任何給定股票的總股東回報率以及股價回報率都很重要。TSR是一種回報計算,考慮到現金股息的價值(假設任何收到的股息都已被再投資),以及任何折價融資和分拆的計算價值。因此,對於支付豐厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股價回報率高得多。我們注意到,對於威廉國際,過去3年的TSR爲-20%,比上述股價回報率要好。這在很大程度上是其分紅派息的結果!

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

While the broader market gained around 3.8% in the last year, Wilmar International shareholders lost 13% (even including dividends). Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 0.6% per year over five years. We realise that Baron Rothschild has said investors should "buy when there is blood on the streets", but we caution that investors should first be sure they are buying a high quality business. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Wilmar International better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Wilmar International (at least 1 which is a bit unpleasant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管包括股息在內,更大範圍的市場在去年賺到了約3.8%,但威廉國際的股東卻虧了13%。即使好的股票股價有時也會下跌,但我們希望在感興趣之前先改善企業的基本指標。遺憾的是,去年的表現結束了一段糟糕的運行,股東在過去五年中每年面臨着總損失0.6%。我們意識到巴倫·羅斯柴爾德曾說過,投資者應該在“大街上有血時買入”,但我們警告投資者首先必須確信他們正在購買高質量的企業。追蹤長期的股價表現總是很有趣的。但是要更好地了解威廉國際,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,時刻存在的投資風險。我們已經確定了威廉國際的3個警告信號(至少有1個有些不愉快),了解這些信號應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you like to buy stocks alongside management, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: most of them are flying under the radar).

如果您喜歡與管理層共同購買股票,那麼您可能會喜歡這個免費的公司列表(提示:大多數公司沒有受到關注)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Singaporean exchanges.

請注意,本文中引用的市場回報反映了當前在新加坡交易所上市股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論