share_log

Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 23% Over the Past Week

Radware Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:RDWR) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 23% Over the Past Week

Radware有限公司(納斯達克代碼:RDWR)的大型機構投資者必須感到高興,因爲該股繼續表現出色,在過去一週內上漲了23%。
Simply Wall St ·  08/01 08:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Radware implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 53% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構對Radware的實質持股表明他們對公司股價有重大影響力。
  • 前10名股東持有53%的業務。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Radware Ltd. (NASDAQ:RDWR), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 55% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解Radware Ltd.(NASDAQ:RDWR)真正的控制權,了解其業務的所有權結構非常重要。持有55%所有權的是機構,這意味着該集團如果股票上漲,則最有利益可獲得(如果出現下行趨勢,則可能失去最多)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$947m in market cap. One-year return to shareholders is currently 37% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週,機構投資者受益最大,公司市值達到94700萬美元。股東一年的回報率目前爲37%,上週的收益是錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Radware.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Radware的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqGS:RDWR Ownership Breakdown August 1st 2024
NasdaqGS:RDWR所有權結構圖解2024年8月1日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Radware?

機構投資者的情況告訴我們Radware有機構投資者,他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這可以表明公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要謹慎,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得一看Radware以下的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Radware does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Radware's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

NasdaqGS:RDWR收益和營收增長2024年8月1日。由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的發行股,所以董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。看起來,對沖基金擁有Radware股票的9.8%。需要注意的是,對沖基金通常是活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創建(和更高的股價)。Senvest Management,LLC目前是公司最大的股東,持有9.8%的流通股。第二和第三大股東是摩根士丹利投資銀行與券商投資和Yehuda Zisapel Estate,它們各自擁有相同數量的股票,佔7.4%。此外,首席執行官Roy Zisapel擁有公司3.7%的股份。

big
NasdaqGS:RDWR Earnings and Revenue Growth August 1st 2024
Radware的內部股權。我們可以報告說,內部人員確實擁有Radware Ltd.的股票。市值僅爲9470萬美元,內部人員以自己的名義持有3500萬美元的股票。一些人會說這顯示出股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,值得檢查內部人是否一直在出售。

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It looks like hedge funds own 9.8% of Radware shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Senvest Management, LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.8% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments and Estate Of Yehuda Zisapel, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.4%. Furthermore, CEO Roy Zisapel is the owner of 3.7% of the company's shares.

看來私人公司擁有Radware股票的7.3%。深入了解一下可能會有所收穫。如果相關方,如內部人員,在這些私人公司中擁有利益,那麼這應在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Radware

Radware的內部股權。我們可以報告說,內部人員確實擁有Radware Ltd.的股票。市值僅爲9470萬美元,內部人員以自己的名義持有3500萬美元的股票。一些人會說這顯示出股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,值得檢查內部人是否一直在出售。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Radware Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$947m, and insiders have US$35m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

Radware的內部股權。我們可以報告說,內部人員確實擁有Radware Ltd.的股票。市值僅爲9470萬美元,內部人員以自己的名義持有3500萬美元的股票。一些人會說這顯示出股東和董事會之間的利益一致。但是,值得檢查內部人是否一直在出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管所有權的規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不相符,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 7.3%, of the Radware stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看起來私人公司擁有防火牆股票的7.3%。可能需要深入研究一下。如果相關方,如內部人員,在這些私人公司中擁有利益,則應在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論