share_log

Galaxy Entertainment Group Limited's (HKG:27) Stock Has Shown Weakness Lately But Financial Prospects Look Decent: Is The Market Wrong?

Galaxy Entertainment Group Limited's (HKG:27) Stock Has Shown Weakness Lately But Financial Prospects Look Decent: Is The Market Wrong?

銀河娛樂股份有限公司(HKG:27)的股票近期表現疲軟,但財務前景看好:市場錯了嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  08/02 18:02

Galaxy Entertainment Group (HKG:27) has had a rough three months with its share price down 17%. However, stock prices are usually driven by a company's financials over the long term, which in this case look pretty respectable. In this article, we decided to focus on Galaxy Entertainment Group's ROE.

Galaxy Entertainment Group (HKG:27) 的股價已下跌17%,遭遇了艱難的三個月。然而,股價通常是受公司長期財務狀況的影響的,在這種情況下,公司財務表現相當可觀。本文將關注於 Galaxy Entertainment Group 的 roe。

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.

淨資產收益率(roe)是衡量公司經營管理層如何有效利用公司資本的關鍵指標。換言之,它是一種利潤率,衡量由公司股東提供的資本的回報率。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

怎樣計算ROE?

ROE can be calculated by using the formula:

淨資產收益率可以使用以下公式進行計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Galaxy Entertainment Group is:

因此,根據上述公式,Galaxy Entertainment Group 的roe爲9.7%:

9.7% = HK$6.9b ÷ HK$71b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).

9.7% = HK $ 69億 ÷ HK $ 710億(截至2023年12月止的最近12個月)。

The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each HK$1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made HK$0.10 in profit.

“回報”是過去十二個月的利潤。其中一種觀念是,對於每1港元的股東資本,公司實現了0.10港元的利潤。

What Has ROE Got To Do With Earnings Growth?

roe與盈利增長有何關係?

We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.

我們已經確定ROE作爲一個高效的盈利規模可以評估公司未來的收益。根據公司選擇再投資或保留多少利潤,我們可以評估公司未來盈利的能力。假設其他所有條件均保持不變,ROE和利潤留存率越高,相對於沒有這些特點的公司,公司的增長率就越高。

Galaxy Entertainment Group's Earnings Growth And 9.7% ROE

Galaxy Entertainment Group 的盈利增長和 9.7% 的roe

On the face of it, Galaxy Entertainment Group's ROE is not much to talk about. However, the fact that the its ROE is quite higher to the industry average of 8.0% doesn't go unnoticed by us. However, Galaxy Entertainment Group's five year net income decline rate was 53%. Remember, the company's ROE is a bit low to begin with, just that it is higher than the industry average. So that could be one of the factors that are causing earnings growth to shrink.

從表面上看,Galaxy Entertainment Group 的roe並不值得一提。但是,它的roe比行業平均水平8.0%高得多,這一點我們不能忽視。但是,Galaxy Entertainment Group 的五年淨利潤下降率爲53%。請記住,公司roe本來就比較低,只是高於行業平均水平。因此,這可能是導致盈利增長收縮的因素之一。

As a next step, we compared Galaxy Entertainment Group's performance with the industry and found thatGalaxy Entertainment Group's performance is depressing even when compared with the industry, which has shrunk its earnings at a rate of 6.3% in the same period, which is a slower than the company.

作爲下一步,我們將Galaxy Entertainment Group的表現與行業進行了比較,並發現即使與行業相比,Galaxy Entertainment Group的表現令人沮喪,在同一時期收益率下降了6.3%,比公司慢。

big
SEHK:27 Past Earnings Growth August 2nd 2024
SEHK:27 過去的盈利增長 2024年8月2日

Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). Doing so will help them establish if the stock's future looks promising or ominous. Is Galaxy Entertainment Group fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide.

盈利增長是股票估值的重要因素。了解市場是否已經反映了公司的預期盈利增長(或下降)對投資者來說尤爲重要。這將有助於他們確定股票未來的前景是看漲還是看跌。Galaxy Entertainment Group與其他公司相比是否定價合理?這3項估值措施可能會幫助您做出決定。

Is Galaxy Entertainment Group Making Efficient Use Of Its Profits?

Galaxy Entertainment Group 是否有效利用其利潤?

Because Galaxy Entertainment Group doesn't pay any regular dividends, we infer that it is retaining all of its profits, which is rather perplexing when you consider the fact that there is no earnings growth to show for it. So there could be some other explanations in that regard. For instance, the company's business may be deteriorating.

由於 Galaxy Entertainment Group 不支付任何定期分紅,因此我們推斷它保留了所有利潤,這在考慮到沒有盈利增長的情況下相當困惑。因此,這方面可能會有其他解釋。例如,公司業務可能在惡化。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

On the whole, we do feel that Galaxy Entertainment Group has some positive attributes. Yet, the low earnings growth is a bit concerning, especially given that the company has a respectable rate of return and is reinvesting a huge portion of its profits. By the looks of it, there could be some other factors, not necessarily in control of the business, that's preventing growth. That being so, the latest industry analyst forecasts show that the analysts are expecting to see a huge improvement in the company's earnings growth rate. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

總的來說,我們認爲 Galaxy Entertainment Group 有一些積極的特質。然而,低的盈利增長率有點令人擔憂,尤其是考慮到公司具有可觀的回報率並且正在將其利潤的巨大部分再投資。看起來,可能有一些其他因素,不一定在業務的控制範圍內,正阻止着增長。即便如此,最新的行業分析師預測表明,分析師正在預計公司的盈利增長率將大幅提高。這些分析師預測是基於行業的總體預期還是基於公司的基本面?單擊這裏,進入我們的分析師預測頁面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論