Private Companies Are Huadian Power International Corporation Limited's (HKG:1071) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b
Private Companies Are Huadian Power International Corporation Limited's (HKG:1071) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped HK$2.9b
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Huadian Power International by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Huadian Power International is 17%
- 私人公司對華電國際電力的重大控制意味着公衆有更多的權力影響管理和治理決策。
- 總共有2個投資者掌握了該公司52%的所有權。
- 華電國際電力的機構持股比例爲17%。
A look at the shareholders of Huadian Power International Corporation Limited (HKG:1071) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看華電國際電力股份有限公司(HKG:1071)的股東,我們可以知道哪個群體最有力量。我們可以看到私人公司擁有該公司54%的所有權。換句話說,該集團面臨了最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As market cap fell to HK$58b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由於市值上週下跌至580億港元,私人公司將比該公司的其他股東面臨更高的虧損風險。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Huadian Power International.
讓我們更加深入地了解一下不同類型的股東對華電國際電力的影響。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Huadian Power International?
機構持股的信息告訴我們關於華電國際電力的信息
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Huadian Power International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Huadian Power International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到華電國際電力確實具有機構投資者,他們持有公司的一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了該股票,他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯的。當多家機構持有一種股票時,存在它們處於“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個方面可能競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到華電國際電力的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事的背後總會有更多。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Huadian Power International. Our data shows that China Huadian Corporation Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 45% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.5% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對華電國際電力的對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,中國華電有限公司是最大的股東,持有45%的流通股。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.5%和2.7%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Huadian Power International
華電國際電力的內部持股量
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.
我們注意到我們的數據沒有顯示任何董事會成員持有股票。在董事會中看到這麼低的個人持股水平是很少見的(我們的數據可能不完整)。關注投資者應查看此處以查看內部人是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 29% stake in Huadian Power International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常,個人投資者的持股比例爲29%,雖然該持股比例相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步則不足以改變公司的政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 54%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司54%的股份,這值得更加深入地探究。如果相關方,例如內部人士,在其中一傢俬人公司中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Huadian Power International you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant.
對公司的真正洞察力需要考慮其他信息。例子是:我們已經發現華電國際電力有2個警告,您應該了解其中一個,而另一個則有點不愉快。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。