share_log

Both Public Companies Who Control a Good Portion of HUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.4% Decrease

Both Public Companies Who Control a Good Portion of HUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) Along With Institutions Must Be Dismayed After Last Week's 6.4% Decrease

上週虎牙(NYSE:HUYA)控制的兩家上市公司以及其它機構必定對其下跌6.4%感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  08/03 10:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over HUYA by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 66% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Tencent Holdings Limited)
  • Institutions own 20% of HUYA
  • 公共公司對虎牙的重要控制意味着普通公衆對管理和治理決策有更大的影響力。
  • 該公司66%的股份由單一股東(tencent n6006有限公司)持有。
  • 機構持有虎牙的20%股份。

A look at the shareholders of HUYA Inc. (NYSE:HUYA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 66% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下HUYA公司(NYSE:HUYA)的股東,就可以知道哪個集團最強大。公共公司擁有最多的股份,佔66%。換句話說,這個集團從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或最大的虧損)。

While institutions, who own 20% shares weren't spared from last week's US$64m market cap drop, public companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

雖然機構持有的20%股份在上週的6400萬美元市值下降中也沒有幸免,但作爲一個整體的公共公司遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about HUYA.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東對虎牙有什麼提示。

big
NYSE:HUYA Ownership Breakdown August 3rd 2024
NYSE:HUYA所有權拆分2024年8月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HUYA?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼關於虎牙?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HUYA. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at HUYA's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在虎牙擁有相當多的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果有多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下HUYA的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:HUYA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 3rd 2024
NYSE:HUYA收入和營業收入增長情況2024年8月3日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in HUYA. Our data shows that Tencent Holdings Limited is the largest shareholder with 66% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund is the second largest shareholder owning 4.3% of common stock, and Point72 Asset Management, L.P. holds about 3.0% of the company stock.

我們注意到,對虎牙沒有任何實際意義的避風基金。我們的數據顯示,tencent n6006有限公司是持有66%流通股份的最大股東。這基本上意味着,如果不是直接控制,他們對公司的未來有很大的影響力。教師保險和年金協會-大學退休證券基金是第二大股東,持有普通股的4.3%,Point72 Asset Management,L.P.持有公司股票的約3.0%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of HUYA

虎牙內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of HUYA Inc.. It seems the board members have no more than US$2.8m worth of shares in the US$938m company. We generally like to see a board more invested. However it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有的HUYA股份不到1%。董事會成員在美國93800萬美元的市值公司中所持有的股份似乎不到280萬美元。我們一般認爲,董事會應該更投入一些。然而,檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在購買也可能是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司的14%股份,因此在公司政策不與大股東同步時,這個股份的大小雖然相當可觀,但可能不足以改變整個公司的決策。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 66% of HUYA. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

在我們看來,公共公司持有虎牙66%的股份。這可能是戰略上的利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。也有可能他們已經解除關係。這個持股可能值得進一步調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HUYA better, we need to consider many other factors.

考慮到持股人的不同群體總是值得思考的。但要更好地了解虎牙,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論