share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Lincoln National Corporation's (NYSE:LNC) Recent US$517m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Lincoln National Corporation's (NYSE:LNC) Recent US$517m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

機構投資者可能會忽略林肯國民公司(紐交所:LNC)最近市值下跌的51700萬美元,因爲長期利潤仍保持積極。
Simply Wall St ·  08/05 06:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lincoln National implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 林肯國民的機構大量持股意味着它們在公司股價上具有重要影響。
  • 前21大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Lincoln National Corporation (NYSE:LNC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制林肯國民公司(NYSE:LNC),那麼您需要了解其股權登記簿的構成。持有該公司股份的最大股權集團佔約74%,即機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將從中最受益(或如果股價下滑則最大虧損)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 9.3% in value last week. However, the 16% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在自己的投資中虧錢,特別是上週看到其持有的股票市值下跌9.3%的機構投資者更是如此。然而,股東在一年內獲得16%的回報可能緩解了這一打擊。但是,他們應該注意未來的進一步損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lincoln National.

在下面的圖表中,我們重點關注林肯國民的不同所有權集團。

big
NYSE:LNC Ownership Breakdown August 5th 2024
NYSE:LNC所有權分佈圖(2024年8月5日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln National?

機構持股有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Lincoln National already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lincoln National, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

林肯國民已經在股權登記簿上擁有機構。實際上,他們擁有公司的相當大一部分股份。這表明了專業投資者之間的可信度。但我們不能僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像其他人一樣做出錯誤的投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價下跌是很常見的。因此,檢查林肯國民過去的收益軌跡(如下圖)是值得的。當然,還需要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:LNC Earnings and Revenue Growth August 5th 2024
NYSE:LNC收入和營業收入增長(2024年8月5日)

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Lincoln National is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 13% of shares outstanding. With 9.8% and 3.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者持有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能共同影響董事會的決策。林肯國民不是由對沖基金持有的。目前持有最多股份的是先鋒集團股份有限公司,佔流通股的13%。黑石集團股份有限公司和道富銀行全球投資者股份有限公司分別持有流通股的9.8%和3.8%,是第二和第三大股東。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln National

林肯國民的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that Lincoln National Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$38m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息顯示,林肯國民公司的內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使持有小比例的股權也可能在董事會和股東之間創造共識。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值3800萬美元的股份。董事會成員持有股份是好事,但最好檢查他們是否一直在增持。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lincoln National. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

佔公司25%股份的散戶,大多是個體投資者,對林肯國民有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權可能不足以在政策決策中起到利好影響,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lincoln National better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Lincoln National (at least 1 which is a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

在考慮股份持有群體時,我們應該始終思考許多其他因素才能更好地了解林肯國民。例如,考慮投資風險的常見影響。我們已經確定了林肯國民的四個警示標誌(至少有一個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該是您投資過程中的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論