Does Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
David Iben如此表達:'波動率不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。' 因此,當您考慮任何給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。 與許多其他公司一樣,菲利普斯66(紐交所:PSX)利用債務。但實際問題是這種債務是否使公司更加危險。
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業不能輕易通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資本來履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債對企業變得具有風險。資本主義的本質就是“創造性破壞”的過程,倒閉的公司會被銀行家毫不留情地清算。然而,常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,一家公司必須以廉價的股票價格稀釋股東權益,僅爲了控制債務。當然,很多公司利用債務來資助成長,沒有任何負面影響。當我們審查債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平。
What Is Phillips 66's Debt?
菲利普斯66的債務是多少?
The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Phillips 66 had US$20.0b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. However, it does have US$2.44b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about US$17.5b.
下面的圖表(點擊可查看更多細節)顯示,菲利普斯66在2024年6月有200億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。但這導致淨債務約爲175億美元,仍有24.4億美元的現金抵消。
How Strong Is Phillips 66's Balance Sheet?
菲利普斯66的資產負債表有多強?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Phillips 66 had liabilities of US$18.3b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$27.2b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$2.44b and US$10.9b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$32.1b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
從最新的資產負債表上可以看到,菲利普斯66有183億美元的債務在一年內到期,而272億美元的債務超過一年到期。而其現金和一年內到期的應收賬款總額爲34.6億美元。因此,其負債總額超過其現金和短期應收賬款的總和321億美元。
While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Phillips 66 has a huge market capitalization of US$56.0b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
雖然這可能聽起來很多,但並不算太糟糕,因爲菲利普斯66的市值巨大,爲560億美元,如果有需要,它可能可以通過增加資本來加強其資產負債表。但我們肯定要密切關注其債務是否帶來太多風險。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。
We'd say that Phillips 66's moderate net debt to EBITDA ratio ( being 2.3), indicates prudence when it comes to debt. And its commanding EBIT of 10.0 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. Importantly, Phillips 66's EBIT fell a jaw-dropping 41% in the last twelve months. If that earnings trend continues then paying off its debt will be about as easy as herding cats on to a roller coaster. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Phillips 66's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
我們可以看到菲利普斯66的中等淨債務/ EBITDA比率(爲2.3),表明在債務方面很謹慎。其主導EBIt的10.0倍利息支出,意味着負債負擔輕如孔雀羽毛。更重要的是,過去十二個月中,菲利普斯66的EBIt駭人聽聞地下降了41%。如果這一收益趨勢持續下去,那麼償還其債務將像在過山車上趕貓一樣容易。更有甚者,我們從資產負債表中了解到了大多數債務。但更重要的是未來的收益,這將決定菲利普斯66維持健康資產負債表的能力前進。因此,如果您專注於未來,您可以查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師盈利預測。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Phillips 66 recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 81% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.
最後,雖然稅務部門可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,值得檢查的是多少EBIt由自由現金流支持。在過去的三年中,菲利普斯66的自由現金流價值達到了其EBIt的81%,比我們通常預期的要 stronger。這使其處於非常強的償還債務的位置。
Our View
我們的觀點
Phillips 66's EBIT growth rate and level of total liabilities definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able to convert EBIT to free cash flow with ease. We think that Phillips 66's debt does make it a bit risky, after considering the aforementioned data points together. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Phillips 66 that you should be aware of before investing here.
考慮到上述數據點後,我們認爲菲利普斯66的EBIt增長率和總負債水平確實對其造成了壓力。但好消息是,它似乎能夠輕鬆將EBIt轉換爲自由現金流。我們認爲,在考慮以上因素後,菲利普斯66的債務確實存在一定風險。這並不一定是壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但這是需要注意的。雖然我們深入了解資產負債表中大部分的債務,但並非所有投資風險都在資產負債表中。例如,我們在此處發現了2個警告信號,應該在此投資之前了解清楚。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。