share_log

Are SigmaStar Technology Ltd.'s (SZSE:301536) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

Are SigmaStar Technology Ltd.'s (SZSE:301536) Fundamentals Good Enough to Warrant Buying Given The Stock's Recent Weakness?

考慮到該股票最近走勢疲軟,SigmaStar科技股份有限公司(SZSE:301536)的基本面足夠好以支撐買入嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  08/05 20:16

It is hard to get excited after looking at SigmaStar Technology's (SZSE:301536) recent performance, when its stock has declined 5.5% over the past three months. But if you pay close attention, you might find that its key financial indicators look quite decent, which could mean that the stock could potentially rise in the long-term given how markets usually reward more resilient long-term fundamentals. Specifically, we decided to study SigmaStar Technology's ROE in this article.

近三個月,沃特世科技(SZSE:301536)股票下跌了5.5%。雖然這看起來並不令人興奮,但如果您仔細觀察,您可能會發現,它的關鍵財務指標看起來相當不錯,這可能意味着,考慮到市場通常會獎勵更具彈性的長期基本面,該股票在長期內有潛力上漲。本文具體研究了沃特世科技的roe。

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.

淨資產收益率(roe)是衡量公司經營管理層如何有效利用公司資本的關鍵指標。換言之,它是一種利潤率,衡量由公司股東提供的資本的回報率。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

怎樣計算ROE?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

股東權益報酬率可以使用以下公式計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for SigmaStar Technology is:

因此,在以上公式的基礎上,沃特世科技的roe爲:

7.5% = CN¥209m ÷ CN¥2.8b (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2024).

7.5% = 2.09億人民幣 ÷ 28億人民幣(基於過去12個月的數據,截至2024年3月)。

The 'return' is the yearly profit. One way to conceptualize this is that for each CN¥1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made CN¥0.08 in profit.

'回報'是每年的利潤。一個概念是,對於每個股東的1元人民幣,該公司賺取0.08元人民幣的利潤。

What Is The Relationship Between ROE And Earnings Growth?

ROE與盈利增長之間的關係是什麼?

So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Assuming all else is equal, companies that have both a higher return on equity and higher profit retention are usually the ones that have a higher growth rate when compared to companies that don't have the same features.

到目前爲止,我們已經了解到roe是衡量公司盈利能力的指標。我們現在需要評估公司重新投資或“保留”的利潤量,從而給我們提供有關公司增長潛力的想法。其他條件相同的情況下,roe和利潤保留率均較高的公司通常是增長率比沒有這些特徵的公司高的公司。

A Side By Side comparison of SigmaStar Technology's Earnings Growth And 7.5% ROE

對比一下沃特世科技盈利增長和7.5%的roe

When you first look at it, SigmaStar Technology's ROE doesn't look that attractive. However, the fact that the company's ROE is higher than the average industry ROE of 5.8%, is definitely interesting. This probably goes some way in explaining SigmaStar Technology's moderate 7.3% growth over the past five years amongst other factors. Bear in mind, the company does have a moderately low ROE. It is just that the industry ROE is lower. Therefore, the growth in earnings could also be the result of other factors. Such as- high earnings retention or the company belonging to a high growth industry.

初看沃特世科技的roe似乎並不吸引人。然而,事實上,該公司的roe高於5.8%的行業平均roe,這是令人感興趣的。這或許是沃特世科技過去五年中保持7.3%溫和增長等因素的原因之一。請記住,該公司的roe雖略低但行業平均roe更低。因此,盈利增長也可能是其它因素造成,例如-高盈利保留或公司屬於高增長行業。

Next, on comparing with the industry net income growth, we found that SigmaStar Technology's reported growth was lower than the industry growth of 20% over the last few years, which is not something we like to see.

接下來,我們將沃特世科技的業績與行業的淨收入增長進行比較,發現沃特世科技報告的增長低於行業在過去幾年中的20%,這不是我們喜歡看到的。

big
SZSE:301536 Past Earnings Growth August 6th 2024
SZSE:301536過去的盈利增長(2024年8月6日)

The basis for attaching value to a company is, to a great extent, tied to its earnings growth. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. If you're wondering about SigmaStar Technology's's valuation, check out this gauge of its price-to-earnings ratio, as compared to its industry.

評估公司價值的基礎在很大程度上與盈利增長相結合。投資者了解市場是否已經將公司預期的盈利增長(或下降)價格化。通過這樣做,他們將知道該股票是否會走向清澈的藍水或等待泥濘的水域。如果您想了解沃特世科技的估值,請查看其市盈率,相對於行業的情況。

Is SigmaStar Technology Using Its Retained Earnings Effectively?

沃特世科技有效利用保留收益嗎?

In SigmaStar Technology's case, its respectable earnings growth can probably be explained by its low three-year median payout ratio of 19% (or a retention ratio of 81%), which suggests that the company is investing most of its profits to grow its business.

對於沃特世科技來說,其可觀的盈利增長可能可以解釋爲其三年中位數的低支付比率爲19%(或保留比率爲81%),這表明公司將其大部分利潤投資於業務增長。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

Overall, we feel that SigmaStar Technology certainly does have some positive factors to consider. In particular, it's great to see that the company is investing heavily into its business and along with a moderate rate of return, that has resulted in a respectable growth in its earnings. While we won't completely dismiss the company, what we would do, is try to ascertain how risky the business is to make a more informed decision around the company. You can see the 2 risks we have identified for SigmaStar Technology by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.

總的來說,我們認爲沃特世科技絕對有一些積極因素值得考慮。特別是,看到公司大力投資其業務,以及適度的回報率,這導致了其盈利的可觀增長,這很棒。雖然我們不會完全否認該公司,但我們會試圖確定業務風險,以做出更明智的決策。您可以在此免費訪問我們的風險儀表板,查看我們爲沃特世科技確定的2種風險。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論