Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CGEM) Institutional Investors Lost 9.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CGEM) Institutional Investors Lost 9.3% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Cullinan Therapeutics implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構對Cullinan Therapeutics的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響力。
- 排名前11的股東持有該業務的52%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:CGEM) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
納斯達克CGEM的股東構成可以告訴我們哪個群體最具有影響力。擁有該公司最多股份的群體是機構,約佔公司股份的44%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大利益(或者如果出現下跌,則會失去最多)。
Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$1.0b last week. Still, the 74% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.
在上週公司市值下跌至10億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。儘管如此,74%的一年漲幅可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。然而,我們認爲,他們將會密切關注未來的弱點。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cullinan Therapeutics.
在下面的圖表中,我們將放大Cullinan Therapeutics的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cullinan Therapeutics?
機構投資者持股情況有助於了解Cullinan Therapeutics的信息。從圖表可以看到,機構投資者在持有該公司的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股,他們喜歡它。但是和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,股票容易出現過度交易的風險。如果這樣的交易出現問題,多方可能會爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。下面可以看到Cullinan Therapeutics的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更多。
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cullinan Therapeutics. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Cullinan Therapeutics, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Cullinan Therapeutics中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經查看了該股票並且喜歡它。但是像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時拋售股票,則經常會出現股價大幅下跌的情況。因此,有必要檢查Cullinan Therapeutics的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還需考慮其他因素。
Our data indicates that hedge funds own 25% of Cullinan Therapeutics. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. BioImpact Capital LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Deerfield Management Company, L.P. Series C is the second largest shareholder owning 5.7% of common stock, and BVF Partners L.P. holds about 5.5% of the company stock.
我們的數據表明,對於Cullinan Therapeutics,對沖基金佔25%。這引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來將爲股東創造近期價值的變化。BioImpact Capital LLC目前是該公司最大的股東,持有13%的流通股。Deerfield Management Company,LP C系列是持有5.7%普通股的第二大股東,並且BVF Partners LP持有公司股票的約5.5%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到11個頭寸最大的股東控制着52%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有的權益超過了多數權益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Cullinan Therapeutics
Cullinan Therapeutics內部管理層持有公司的股份。考慮到這是一家大公司,看到管理層和公司利益的調和總是好的。內部人員持有價值6,100萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果你想了解內部人員的持股問題,可以點擊這裏查看是否有內部人員正在購買或出售。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$47m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
股東們可能會想了解,內部人士持有Cullinan Therapeutics股票。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的合作是一件好事。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約爲4700萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。但仍有必要檢查那些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 21% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cullinan Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有約21%的普通投資者(主要由個人投資者組成)對Cullinan Therapeutics具有一定的影響力。儘管擁有相當大的持股,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不一致,則可能無法改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 5.1% stake in Cullinan Therapeutics. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私人股權公司持有Cullinan Therapeutics的5.1%股份,這表明它們在關鍵政策決策方面可能具有影響力。有時我們會看到私人股權會長期堅持,但總的來說,它們具有較短的投資週期,並且不會太多地投資於上市公司。過一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售並重新配置資本。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Cullinan Therapeutics (at least 2 which make us uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我非常有興趣看看誰實際擁有公司。但是,爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險始終存在。我們已經發現Cullinan Therapeutics存在四個警告信號(至少有兩個讓我們感到不舒服),了解它們應該是您的投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。