Health Check: How Prudently Does UTime (NASDAQ:WTO) Use Debt?
Health Check: How Prudently Does UTime (NASDAQ:WTO) Use Debt?
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that UTime Limited (NASDAQ:WTO) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
傳奇基金經理李璐(受查理·芒格支持)曾說:“最大的投資風險不是價格波動,而是你是否會遭受本金的永久損失。”因此,當您考慮任何給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲太多的債務可能會沉沒一家公司。我們注意到UTime Limited(納斯達克:WTO)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但是,股東們是否應該擔心其借貸使用?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務會爲企業提供幫助,直到企業無法還清,無論是通過新的資本還是自由現金流。資本主義的本質是“創造性破壞”過程,失敗的企業都會被銀行家無情地清算。然而,更爲頻繁但同樣代價高昂的情況是,公司必須以極低的價格發行股票,永久性地稀釋股東利益,以彌補其資產負債表。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理管理其債務,使其受益。當我們考慮公司的債務使用時,我們首先要看現金和債務。
What Is UTime's Net Debt?
UTime的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that UTime had CN¥56.9m of debt in March 2024, down from CN¥61.9m, one year before. However, its balance sheet shows it holds CN¥76.7m in cash, so it actually has CN¥19.7m net cash.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但它顯示UTime在2024年3月有5690萬元的債務,比一年前的6190萬元少。但是,其資產負債表顯示它持有7670萬元的現金,因此它實際上有1970萬元的淨現金。
A Look At UTime's Liabilities
看一下UTime的負債情況
The latest balance sheet data shows that UTime had liabilities of CN¥272.8m due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥14.5m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had CN¥76.7m in cash and CN¥30.8m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥179.9m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新資產負債表數據顯示,UTime有27280萬元的短期債務,在之後有1450萬元的到期債務。抵消這些,它有7670萬元的現金和3080萬元的應收票據,這些票據在12個月內到期。因此,它負債總額超過其現金和短期應收票據合計17990萬元。
Of course, UTime has a market capitalization of CN¥3.99b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward. While it does have liabilities worth noting, UTime also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But you can't view debt in total isolation; since UTime will need earnings to service that debt. So if you're keen to discover more about its earnings, it might be worth checking out this graph of its long term earnings trend.
當然,UTime的市值爲39.9億人民幣,因此這些負債可能是可管理的。但是有足夠的負債,我們肯定建議股東繼續關注資產負債表情況。雖然它確實有值得注意的負債,但UTime的現金超過債務,因此我們非常有信心它可以安全地管理其債務。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解到大部分關於債務的信息。但是你不能單獨看待債務;因爲UTime需要盈利來償還那些債務。因此,如果您想更了解其收益情況,查看這個長期收益趨勢圖可能會有幫助。
Over 12 months, UTime made a loss at the EBIT level, and saw its revenue drop to CN¥172m, which is a fall of 14%. That's not what we would hope to see.
在過去12個月中,UTime的EBIT虧損並且其收入下降至17200萬元,降幅爲14%,這不是我們所希望看到的。
So How Risky Is UTime?
那麼UTime有多大的風險?
We have no doubt that loss making companies are, in general, riskier than profitable ones. And we do note that UTime had an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) loss, over the last year. Indeed, in that time it burnt through CN¥377m of cash and made a loss of CN¥32m. Given it only has net cash of CN¥19.7m, the company may need to raise more capital if it doesn't reach break-even soon. Overall, we'd say the stock is a bit risky, and we're usually very cautious until we see positive free cash flow. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for UTime you should know about.
我們毫不懷疑,虧損公司總的來說比盈利公司更有風險。我們確實注意到UTime去年EBIT虧損。事實上,在那段時間裏,它燒掉了37700萬元現金並且虧損了3200萬元。考慮到它只有1970萬元的淨現金,如果它不能很快達到盈虧平衡,該公司可能需要籌集更多資金。總體而言,我們認爲這支股票有點風險,而且我們通常非常謹慎,直到看到正面的自由現金流爲止。顯然,當您分析債務時,資產負債表是需要關注的地方。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內 - 遠非如此。這些風險可能難以發現,每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現UTime有4個警示信號,您需要知道這些信號。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。