share_log

Is PG&E (NYSE:PCG) A Risky Investment?

Is PG&E (NYSE:PCG) A Risky Investment?

紐交所:PCG是否是一個冒險的投資?
Simply Wall St ·  08/06 12:23

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:“波動和風險是遠非等同的概念。”當我們考慮一家公司的風險程度時,通常會查看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務負擔過重可能導致破產。 我們注意到PG&E公司(紐交所:PCG)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但這筆債務對股東來說是否是一個問題呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

總的來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還它時才會成爲一個真正的問題,要麼通過募集資本要麼通過自身現金流。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以低廉的股票價格削弱股東權益,以控制債務。通過取代股份稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資於增長的企業的極好工具。考慮一家公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務合併考慮。

How Much Debt Does PG&E Carry?

PG&E負債多少?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, PG&E had US$59.2b of debt, up from US$54.1b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had US$1.32b in cash, and so its net debt is US$57.9b.

正如下面所示,在2024年6月底,PG&E公司的債務總額爲592億美元,高於一年前的541億美元。 單擊圖像以獲取更多詳細信息。 然而,它還擁有1.32億美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲579億美元。

big
NYSE:PCG Debt to Equity History August 6th 2024
紐交所:PCG股權和負債歷史記錄2024年8月6日

A Look At PG&E's Liabilities

我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,PG&E的到期負債共計185億美元,而到期時間在一年之內;到期時間在一年以上的負債總計857億美元。抵消這一點的是,它擁有1.32億美元的現金和121億美元應在12個月內到期的應收款項。 因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收款項的總和908億美元。

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that PG&E had liabilities of US$18.5b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$85.7b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$1.32b in cash and US$12.1b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$90.8b.

這裏的虧空嚴重影響這家公司,就像一個孩子揹着一隻裝滿了書、運動裝備和小號的沉重揹包,所以毫無疑問,我們應密切關注它的資產負債表。 畢竟,如果PG&E今天不得不向其債權人支付款項,它可能需要進行大規模重新籌資。

The deficiency here weighs heavily on the US$39.4b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. After all, PG&E would likely require a major re-capitalisation if it had to pay its creditors today.

利息覆蓋率爲1.9倍,患有高達6.9的淨債務/ EBIDTA比率,這如同是一個把打擊我們對PG&E的信懇智能像是一次簡單的重擊和打擊。這意味着我們認爲它的債務負擔沉重。好消息是,PG&E在過去的12個月中平穩地增長了56%的EBIt,就像母親對新生兒的懷抱一樣,這種增長可以增強韌性,使公司處於更強的管理債務的位置。當您分析債務水平時,很明顯資產負債表是需要關注的領域。 但是,最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定PG&E是否能隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想看看專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

Weak interest cover of 1.9 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.9 hit our confidence in PG&E like a one-two punch to the gut. This means we'd consider it to have a heavy debt load. The good news is that PG&E grew its EBIT a smooth 56% over the last twelve months. Like a mother's loving embrace of a newborn that sort of growth builds resilience, putting the company in a stronger position to manage its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if PG&E can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

弱的1.9倍利息覆蓋率和令人不安的6.9倍EBITDA淨債務比率給我們對PG&E的信懇智能帶來了沉重打擊和衝擊。這意味着我們認爲它的債務負擔沉重。好消息是,PG&E在過去的12個月中平穩地增長了56%的EBIt,就像母親對新生兒的懷抱一樣,這種增長可以增強韌性,使公司處於更強的管理債務的位置。當您分析債務水平時,很明顯資產負債表是需要關注的領域。但是,最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定PG&E是否能隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想看看專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, PG&E saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,雖然稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受真正的現金。因此,我們顯然需要查看EBIt是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,PG&E的自由現金流總額相當大。儘管投資者毫無疑問期望這種情況很快會逆轉,但這顯然意味着其債務使用更加風險。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, PG&E's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its EBIT growth rate is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We should also note that Electric Utilities industry companies like PG&E commonly do use debt without problems. We're quite clear that we consider PG&E to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. For this reason we're pretty cautious about the stock, and we think shareholders should keep a close eye on its liquidity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for PG&E you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

乍一看,PG&E的EBIt到自由現金流的轉化使我們對該股持擱淺態度,其總負債水平的水平也沒有比年度最繁忙日的一個空餐廳更具吸引力。但是,好的一面是,其EBIt增長率是一個好跡象,這使我們更加樂觀。我們還應注意,像PG&E這樣的電力公用事業公司通常使用債務而沒有問題。我們非常清楚,考慮到其資產負債表的健康狀況,在很大程度上會認爲PG&E相當危險。因此,出於這個原因,我們對該股持謹慎態度,並認爲股東應密切關注其流動性。當您分析債務水平時,很明顯資產負債表是需要關注的領域。然而,並不是所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。例如:我們發現PG&E存在3個警告信號,您應該知道,其中1個可能非常嚴重。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論