Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SBLK) 6.4% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Institutions
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.'s (NASDAQ:SBLK) 6.4% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 58% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Star Bulk Carriers' significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 33% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 37% of Star Bulk Carriers is held by Institutions
- Star Bulk Carriers顯著的零售投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東影響。
- 前25名股東持有該業務的33%。
- 機構持有Star Bulk Carriers的37%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ:SBLK), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 58% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ:SBLK),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。在該公司持有最多股份的集團中,約佔58%的是零售投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲得最大利益(如果出現經濟下行,則將遭受最大損失)。
While institutions, who own 37% shares weren't spared from last week's US$166m market cap drop, retail investors as a group suffered the maximum losses
雖然持有37%股份的機構沒有逃過上週1.66億美元市值的下跌,但作爲整體的零售投資者卻遭受了最大的損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Star Bulk Carriers.
讓我們更仔細地看一看不同類型的股東對Star Bulk Carriers的影響。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240807/0-64fee5d761360b69238cec25d041af8f-0-47722792c60abd4b6970b333bf2598b1.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Star Bulk Carriers?
機構持股告訴我們關於Star Bulk Carriers什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Star Bulk Carriers. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Star Bulk Carriers' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Star Bulk Carriers中佔有相當比例。這表明專業投資者中存在一定的信譽度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資決策,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有某個股票時,總是存在被“擠兌”的風險。當這樣的交易出問題時,多方可能會競相快速賣出該股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到Star Bulk Carriers的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住事情總是更復雜。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240807/0-64fee5d761360b69238cec25d041af8f-1-b884d1cd3eb919a72e3cf0e0e7936938.png/big)
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Star Bulk Carriers. The company's largest shareholder is AllianceBernstein L.P., with ownership of 4.7%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.6% and 3.5% of the stock. Petros Pappas, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.
對Star Bulk Carriers進行股票分析,對沖基金沒有太多股票。該公司最大的股東是AllianceBernstein L.P.,持有4.7%的股份。與之相比,第二和第三大股東持有約4.6%和3.5%的股份。第三大股東Petros Pappas同時還擔任董事會成員。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Star Bulk Carriers
Star Bulk Carriers的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Star Bulk Carriers Corp.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$84m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人員持有Star Bulk Carriers Corp.的一些股份。這是一個大公司,因此看到這種程度的對齊是好的。內部人員持有8400萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間存在利益的一致性。但是,如果這些內部人員一直在出售股票,這可能是值得檢查的。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 58% of Star Bulk Carriers. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有Star Bulk Carriers的58%。這種所有權規模使得普通公衆的投資者擁有某種集體權力。他們可以並且可能會影響高管薪酬、紅利政策和擬議的業務收購等決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Star Bulk Carriers , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有更重要的因素。例如,投資風險的永恒幽靈。我們已經發現了Star Bulk Carriers的4個警告信號,了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。