share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項措施表明百事可樂(納斯達克:PEP)合理運用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 07:20

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that PepsiCo, Inc. (NASDAQ:PEP) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

傳奇基金經理陸正茂(查理·芒格支持的人)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是是否會遭受資本的永久性損失。」因此,當您考慮任何給定的股票有多大風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲太多債務可能會使一家公司陷入困境。我們可以看到,百事可樂公司(納斯達克:PEP)在其業務中確實使用了債務。但是,這種債務是否會擔憂股東呢?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還其貸款人,那麼它就處在貸款人的控制之下。 如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制企業。 然而,更常見的(但仍然痛苦的)情況是必須以低價籌集新股本,從而永久地稀釋股東權益。當然,債務可以是企業中的重要工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does PepsiCo Carry?

百事可樂承載了多少債務?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that PepsiCo had US$44.9b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$6.67b in cash leading to net debt of about US$38.3b.

下圖顯示,您可以單擊查看詳細信息,百事可樂於2024年6月份的債務爲449億美元,與前一年大致相同。而現金爲66.7億美元,導致淨債務約爲383億美元。

big
NasdaqGS:PEP Debt to Equity History August 8th 2024
NasdaqGS:PEP資產負債率歷史記錄2024年8月8日

How Strong Is PepsiCo's Balance Sheet?

百事可樂的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that PepsiCo had liabilities of US$31.1b due within a year, and liabilities of US$48.8b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$6.67b and US$11.9b worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$61.3b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,百事可樂有311億美元的短期負債,之後有488億美元的到期債務。另一方面,其現金爲66.7億美元,短期應收賬款爲119億美元。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款加起來還多613億美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since PepsiCo has a huge market capitalization of US$236.9b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt.

雖然這可能看起來很多,但這並不是太壞,因爲百事可樂市值非常高,達到了2369億美元,因此,如果需要,它可能可以通過發行股票來加強資產負債表。然而,仍有必要仔細研究其償還債務的能力。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

PepsiCo's net debt to EBITDA ratio of about 2.3 suggests only moderate use of debt. And its commanding EBIT of 14.6 times its interest expense, implies the debt load is as light as a peacock feather. PepsiCo grew its EBIT by 9.1% in the last year. That's far from incredible but it is a good thing, when it comes to paying off debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PepsiCo's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

百事可樂的淨債務/ EBITDA比率約爲2.3,表明債務使用僅適度。其主導的EBIt爲14.6倍於其利息支出,這意味着債務負載像孔雀羽毛一樣輕盈。百事可樂在過去一年中的EBIt增長了9.1%。雖然不是令人難以置信,但在償還債務方面還是件好事。資產負債表顯然是分析債務的關注點。但是,與其它事情相比,未來的盈利更能決定百事可樂維持健康的資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這篇有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, PepsiCo recorded free cash flow of 49% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤無法解決問題。因此,值得檢查的是EBIt的多少被自由現金流支持。查看最近三年的數據,百事可樂的自由現金流爲其EBIt的49%,這比我們預期的要弱。這在償還債務方面並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for PepsiCo was the fact that it seems able to cover its interest expense with its EBIT confidently. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit handle its debt, based on its EBITDA,. When we consider all the elements mentioned above, it seems to us that PepsiCo is managing its debt quite well. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for PepsiCo that you should be aware of before investing here.

當涉及資產負債表時,百事可樂最突出的優點是,它似乎能夠自信地用其EBIt支付利息費用。但是,我們的其他觀察並不那麼令人振奮。例如,根據其EBITDA,它似乎有點難以應對其債務。當我們考慮上述所有要素時,似乎百事可樂對其債務的管理相當不錯。話雖如此,由於負擔足夠沉重,我們建議所有股東都要密切關注它。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,相反,還有其他方面。例如,我們發現了PepsiCo三個警告信號,您在進行投資之前應該注意。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論