share_log

Individual Investors Among INESA Intelligent Tech Inc.'s (SHSE:600602) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.7% Price Drop

Individual Investors Among INESA Intelligent Tech Inc.'s (SHSE:600602) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.7% Price Drop

上海電氣智能裝備股份有限公司的個人投資者是其最大的股東之一,在上週股價下跌了7.7%後受到了影響。
Simply Wall St ·  08/08 18:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • INESA Intelligent Tech's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • INESA智能科技的重要個人投資者所有權表明,關鍵決策受到來自大衆股東的影響。
  • 前25名股東持有43%的業務。
  • 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of INESA Intelligent Tech Inc. (SHSE:600602) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 57% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看INESA智能科技股份有限公司 (SHSE:600602) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有力量。個人投資者持有該公司的最大股份達57%。換句話說,該團體對其投資所獲得的回報或受到的影響最大。

As a result, individual investors as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥1.1b.

因此,個人投資者作爲一個群體,在市值下跌CN¥11億後上周遭受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about INESA Intelligent Tech.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對INESA智能科技的影響。

big
SHSE:600602 Ownership Breakdown August 8th 2024
SHSE:600602所有權分佈2024年8月8日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About INESA Intelligent Tech?

機構投資者對INESA智能科技的意見和看法表明了什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that INESA Intelligent Tech does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at INESA Intelligent Tech's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到INESA智能科技確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。這意味着專業投資者中存在一定的可靠性。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資決策。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下INESA智能科技以下的收入歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SHSE:600602 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 8th 2024
SHSE:600602收益和營業收入增長2024年8月8日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in INESA Intelligent Tech. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is INESA (Group) Co., Ltd. with 35% of shares outstanding. GF Fund Management Co., Ltd. is the second largest shareholder owning 1.0% of common stock, and Zhong Ou Fund Management Co., Ltd holds about 0.7% of the company stock.

我們注意到對INESA智能科技沒有有意義的對沖基金投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是INESA(集團)有限公司,持有35%的流通股。國海富蘭克林基金管理有限公司是第二大股東,擁有1.0%的普通股,中歐基金管理有限公司持有該公司股票的約0.7%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好禮。該股票受到的分析師覆蓋範圍很小,但不多。因此,它有更多的空間獲得更多的覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of INESA Intelligent Tech

INESA智能科技的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of INESA Intelligent Tech Inc. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥52m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人員直接擁有INESA智能科技股份不到1%。然而,我們確實注意到,內部人員可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接擁有股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的持股也可以在董事會和股東之間建立一定的利益共同體。在這種情況下,內部人員擁有人民幣5200萬元的股份。看到至少有一些內部所有權總是不錯的,但值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 57% stake in INESA Intelligent Tech, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆在INESA智能科技中擁有57%的股份,表明它是一個相當受歡迎的股票。擁有這麼多的所有權,零售投資者可以共同在影響股東回報的決策,例如股息政策和董事的任命上起到作用。他們也可以行使權力投票,以針對可能不會改善盈利能力的收購或合併。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 35%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的35%股份。這可能值得更深入地挖掘。如果相關方如內幕人士在其中一傢俬人公司中擁有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司也可能對公司具有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand INESA Intelligent Tech better, we need to consider many other factors.

始終值得考慮持有一家公司股份的不同團體。但爲了更好地了解INESA智能科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論