share_log

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.'s (NYSE:DNA) Latest 23% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.'s (NYSE:DNA) Latest 23% Decline Adds to One-year Losses, Institutional Investors May Consider Drastic Measures

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.(紐交所股票代碼:DNA)最新的23%下跌加劇了一年的損失,機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施。
Simply Wall St ·  08/09 15:41

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考慮到機構所持有的大量股份,銀杏生物科技控股的股價可能受他們交易決策的影響。
  • 共有12家投資者擁有51%的控股權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:DNA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 36% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

銀杏生物科技控股的每個投資者(NYSE:DNA)都應該了解最強勢的股東群體。而擁有36%所有權的機構則掌握着最大的股份,即如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的利益(或如果發生下滑,將會損失最慘)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 23% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 84% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

機構投資者在上週看到了他們的持股價值下跌了23%。 近期的損失增加了投資者一年來的84%的虧損,這可能不適合這一投資者群體。 機構通常被稱爲「市場搬運工」,他們在影響任何股票價格動態方面具有重要的影響力。 因此,如果銀杏生物科技控股的股價繼續走弱,機構投資者可能會感到有必要出售其持有的股份,這對個人投資者可能不是最理想的狀態。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings.

接下來我們將更加深入地了解不同類型的股東信息對銀杏生物科技控股的影響。

big
NYSE:DNA Ownership Breakdown August 9th 2024
紐交所(NYSE):DNA所有權結構(2024年8月9日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings?

機構所有權告訴我們有關銀杏生物科技控股的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

銀杏生物科技控股已經有機構在持股名冊上。事實上,他們擁有公司中可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經檢查過該股票並且他們很喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看以下的銀杏生物科技控股的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:DNA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 9th 2024
銀杏生物科技控股(NYSE:DNA)的收益和營收增長情況(2024年8月9日)

It would appear that 6.4% of Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Cascade Investment, L.L.C., with ownership of 6.8%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.4% and 6.0% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Jason Kelly directly holds 3.8% of the total shares outstanding.

看起來,銀杏生物科技控股的6.4%股份由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金往往是非常活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多基金都希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。該公司最大的股東是Cascade Investment,L.L.C.,擁有6.8%的股份。和這隻股票的第二大和第三大股東分別持有6.4%和6.0%的股份。此外,該公司的首席執行官Jason Kelly直接持有總流通股的3.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前12名股東現在擁有該公司51%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對該公司具有顯着的控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings

銀杏生物科技控股的內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$611m, and insiders have US$103m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來內部人擁有銀杏生物科技控股公司的大部分股份。它的市值只有6110萬美元,內部人員就擁有着價值1030萬美元的股票。看到內部人員這樣重視這家公司的業務真是不錯。也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員最近有沒有購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司32%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管佔有的股份很大,但如果該決定與其他大股東不同步,其大小可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 6.8%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有6.8%的股權,私人股本公司有能力在價值創造方面發揮作用,從而對塑造企業戰略起到作用。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

我覺得了解到一家公司的股東是誰非常有趣。但爲了獲得真正的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如風險- 銀杏生物科技控股有4個風險警告(還有1個有點不太好的),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論