The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV) Insiders Who Own 47% of the Company
The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV) Insiders Who Own 47% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- GDEV's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 63% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- GDEV擁有大量內部所有權,這表明公司擴張有固有的利益
- 63% 的業務由前兩名股東持有
- 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會
If you want to know who really controls GDEV Inc. (NASDAQ:GDEV), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 47% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着GDEV Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:GDEV),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有47%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 14%.
上週,由於該股下跌了14%,內部人士遭受了最大的損失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of GDEV.
在下圖中,我們放大了 GDEV 的不同所有權組。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About GDEV?
關於GDEV,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.
我們往往不會看到機構投資者持有風險很大、交易量稀少或規模很小的公司的股票。儘管我們有時會看到大公司沒有註冊機構,但這種情況並不特別常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. GDEV might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。基金經理也可能不擁有這隻股票,因爲他們不相信股票會表現良好。GDEV可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們根本沒有仔細研究該業務。
GDEV is not owned by hedge funds. Everix Investments Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 41% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 22% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 16% by the third-largest shareholder. Andrey Fadeev, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
GDEV不歸對沖基金所有。Everix投資有限公司目前是最大股東,已發行股份的41%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約22%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有16%的所有權。第二大股東安德烈·法德耶夫也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.
在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。
Insider Ownership Of GDEV
GDEV 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of GDEV Inc.. Insiders own US$215m worth of shares in the US$458m company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎擁有GDEV Inc.的很大一部分股份。內部人士擁有這家價值4.58億美元的公司價值2.15億美元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over GDEV. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有12%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對GDEV有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 41%, of the GDEV stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
私人公司似乎擁有GDEV股票的41%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - GDEV has 3 warning signs (and 2 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-GDEV 有 3 個警告信號(以及 2 個不容忽視的),我們認爲你應該知道。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接聯繫我們。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。