share_log

With 79% Institutional Ownership, HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 79% Institutional Ownership, HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

憑藉79%的機構持股比例,惠普公司(紐交所:HPQ)是大佬們的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  08/12 10:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, HP's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 考慮到機構在該股票中擁有大量持股,惠普的股價可能會受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 共有21名投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔有50%的所有權
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

爲了了解誰真正掌控惠普(NYSE:HPQ),了解業務的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,機構在公司擁有79%的所有權。換句話說,該集團在公司的投資中獲得或損失最多。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of HP.

下面的圖表展示了惠普的不同所有權組。

big
NYSE:HPQ Ownership Breakdown August 12th 2024
NYSE:HPQ所有權分佈圖2024年8月12日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HP?

機構持股情況對惠普有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HP. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see HP's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在惠普有相當大的利益。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要依賴於機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在一個「擁擠」的交易風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方將競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到惠普的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜。

big
NYSE:HPQ Earnings and Revenue Growth August 12th 2024
NYSE:HPQ收益和營收增長圖2024年8月12日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. HP is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.9% and 4.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有該公司50%以上的股份,因此共同可以強烈影響董事會決策。惠普並非由對沖基金擁有。通過查看我們的數據,可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,其持有12%的流通股。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.9%和4.6%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 21 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

撫順特鋼股份有限公司內部所有權49.99%由前21名股東控制。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of HP

惠普的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of HP Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$66m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員擁有惠普股票不到1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只預計內部人員擁有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值6600萬美元的股票。可以點擊此處查看內幕人士是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in HP. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個人投資者的公衆擁有惠普公司21%的股份。雖然這種所有權可能不足以在公司的政策決策中佔據優勢地位,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HP better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for HP (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

始終要考慮在公司中持有股份的不同群體。但爲了更好地了解惠普,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經看到惠普的3個警示信號(其中1個不能被忽視!),您應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論