Gemdale (SHSE:600383) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Gemdale (SHSE:600383) Takes On Some Risk With Its Use Of Debt
Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Gemdale Corporation (SHSE:600383) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性和風險遠非同義詞。」因此,當你考慮某個股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲太多的債務可能會導致企業破產。我們可以看到,金地集團(SHSE:600383)在業務中確實使用了債務。但是,股東們是否應該擔心它的債務使用情況?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無法償還債權人,那麼它就處於他們的掌控之下。資本主義的一部分是「創意毀滅」過程,失敗的企業被無情地清算。然而,更頻繁的(但仍然昂貴的)情況是企業不得不以折價發行股票,永久性稀釋股東,才能支持其資產負債表。當然,債務可以是企業重要的工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們考慮一個公司的債務使用情況時,首先要看現金和債務的總體情況。
What Is Gemdale's Net Debt?
金地集團的淨債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Gemdale had CN¥89.3b of debt in March 2024, down from CN¥118.0b, one year before. However, it also had CN¥24.4b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥64.8b.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數字,但它顯示,金地集團在2024年3月有893億元的債務,比一年前的1180億元減少。然而,它還有244億元的現金,因此其淨債務爲648億元。
How Strong Is Gemdale's Balance Sheet?
金地集團的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, Gemdale had liabilities of CN¥194.3b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥57.4b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting this, it had CN¥24.4b in cash and CN¥98.1b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥129.2b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
根據最近公佈的資產負債表,金地集團有1943億元的短期負債,574億元的長期負債。抵消這些負債,它有244億元的現金和981億元的應收賬款,這些賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款加起來還多1292億元。
This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥15.1b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we definitely think shareholders need to watch this one closely. At the end of the day, Gemdale would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
這個虧損多達151億元的公司股價面臨着陰影,就像一個巨人屹立在普通人的頭頂上。因此,我們認爲股東們絕對需要密切關注這個股票。歸根結底,如果金地集團的債權人要求償還債務,它可能需要大規模重新融資。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。
Strangely Gemdale has a sky high EBITDA ratio of 14.5, implying high debt, but a strong interest coverage of 1k. So either it has access to very cheap long term debt or that interest expense is going to grow! Shareholders should be aware that Gemdale's EBIT was down 55% last year. If that decline continues then paying off debt will be harder than selling foie gras at a vegan convention. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gemdale can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
奇怪的是,金地集團EBITDA比率高達14.5,表明負債高,但利息覆蓋率強,達到了0.1萬。因此,要麼它有訪問非常便宜的長期債務,要麼利息支出將會增長!股東應注意,金地集團的EBIt去年下降了55%。如果這種下降趨勢持續下去,償還債務將比在素食主義者大會上賣鵝肝醬還要難。在分析債務時,資產負債表明顯是需要關注的領域。但是,最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定金地集團能否隨着時間推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現我們的分析師利潤預測免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, Gemdale actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最後,公司需要自由現金流來償還債務,會計利潤不足以實現這一點。因此,我們總是要檢查EBIt中有多少被轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,金地集團實際上產生的自由現金流比EBIt多。這種強勁的現金轉換方式讓我們感到興奮,就像達夫特朋克音樂會上的觀衆一樣。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, Gemdale's EBIT growth rate left us tentative about the stock, and its level of total liabilities was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its interest cover is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. We're quite clear that we consider Gemdale to be really rather risky, as a result of its balance sheet health. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gemdale (including 1 which is concerning) .
從表面上看,金地集團的EBIt增長率使我們對該股持觀望態度,其總負債水平同樣不如每年最繁忙的夜晚最冷清的一家餐廳吸引人。但好的一面是,它的利息覆蓋率是一個不錯的標誌,這讓我們更加樂觀。我們非常清楚,由於其資產負債表健康狀況,我們認爲金地集團的風險實際上相當大。因此,我們對這個股票非常謹慎,就像飢餓的小貓對主人的魚池一樣謹慎:一旦咬了一口,就非常謹慎。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的開始區域。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。爲此,您應該了解我們在金地集團發現的3個警告信號(其中1個是令人擔憂的)。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。