share_log

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 82% of the Company

機構投資者持有公司82%,RPm International Inc.(紐交所:RPM)備受青睞
Simply Wall St ·  08/13 09:19

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in RPM International implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 12 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構的持股明顯意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 前12名股東持有該公司51%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of RPM International Inc. (NYSE:RPM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解RPm International Inc.(紐約證交所:RPM)真正掌控權的人,重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。 持有公司最多股份的集團,確切地說是約82%的機構。 也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者有下行趨勢),這個集團將會受益最多。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RPM International.

在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於RPm International的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:RPM Ownership Breakdown August 13th 2024
紐約證交所RPm所有權分佈2024年8月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RPM International?

機構所有權對RPm International有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

RPM International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RPM International, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

RPm International在股東名冊上已經有了機構。 實際上,他們擁有公司的相當大的股份。 這表明專業投資者已經給予了一定的信任。 但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時候會犯錯誤投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,很常見會出現股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查RPm International的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:RPM Earnings and Revenue Growth August 13th 2024
紐約證交所RPm收益和營收增長2024年8月13日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RPM International. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 10% of common stock, and Aristotle Capital Management, LLC holds about 7.2% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Frank Sullivan is the owner of 0.8% of the company's shares.

機構投資者擁有公司的超過50%,因此他們可能一起強烈影響董事會的決策。對於RPm International,對沖基金持有的股份不多。公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,擁有11%的股份。BlackRock,Inc.是第二大股東,擁有10%的普通股,而Aristotle Capital Management,LLC持有公司股票的約7.2%。此外,首席執行官Frank Sullivan擁有該公司股份的0.8%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

考慮到前12名股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東擁有多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of RPM International

RPm International的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in RPM International Inc.. Insiders own US$185m worth of shares (at current prices). we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有RPm International Inc.的股份。內部人員持有價值1,850萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。我們有時會關注他們是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in RPM International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有RPm International 16%的股份。儘管這個群體不能決定公司的事務,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand RPM International better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - RPM International has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

思考一家公司股權所屬不同群體總是值得的。 但是,要更好地了解RPm International,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,要考慮的風險 - RPm International有1個預警信號,我們認爲你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論