share_log

Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 65%

Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 65%

杜克能源公司(紐交所:DUK)是機構投資者的最愛,他們持有65%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  08/14 06:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Duke Energy's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構高度持股意味着杜克能源的股價對他們的交易行動非常敏感。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,佔公司股份43%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Duke Energy Corporation (NYSE:DUK) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 65% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一下Duke Energy Corporation (紐交所:DUK)的股東,我們就可以知道哪個群體最有權勢。我們可以看到機構持有公司的大部分股份,擁有65%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的利潤(如果出現下跌,也將承受最大的損失)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Duke Energy.

在下圖中,我們放大查看了不同的杜克能源股權所有者群體。

big
NYSE:DUK Ownership Breakdown August 14th 2024
紐交所:DUK股權結構分佈2024年8月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Duke Energy?

機構持股告訴我們杜克能源的哪些信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Duke Energy does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Duke Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,杜克能源確實擁有機構投資者;而且他們持有公司的股份相當大。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過該股票並喜歡它。但是與其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構投資同一只股票時,總會存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方面可能會競相賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以查看Duke Energy歷史上的收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事永遠不只侷限於此。

big
NYSE:DUK Earnings and Revenue Growth August 14th 2024
紐交所:DUK收入和收益增長2024年8月14日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Duke Energy. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.2%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.0% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要權利。對於杜克能源,對沖基金持股不多。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,股權佔比9.2%。爲了解背景,第二大股東持有約7.4%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.0%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Duke Energy

杜克能源的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Duke Energy Corporation. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$123m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明,內部人員所持有的Duke Energy Corporation的股份少於1%。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人員持有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值1,230萬美元的股份。在這種情況下,更有意思的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 34% stake in Duke Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常是個人投資者的普通公衆持有杜克能源的34%的股份。這樣的所有權規模雖然很大,但如果該決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Duke Energy (at least 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。比如,投資風險的永恒威脅。我們已經確定了杜克能源的3個預警信號(至少其中的1個讓我們有點不舒服),理解它們應該是你的投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論