UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%
UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 83%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in UFP Industries implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構對UFP Industries的實質性持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力。
- 企業前11大股東持有其51%的股份。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
A look at the shareholders of UFP Industries, Inc. (NASDAQ:UFPI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
看一看UFP Industries, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:UFPI)的股東,我們可以知道哪一個股東群體最具影響力。我們可以看到機構擁有公司83%的所有權,這意味着該群體在股票上漲時獲益最多(或在經濟下行時損失最高)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of UFP Industries, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解UFP Industries的每個業主類型,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240815/0-49a742772f49b2e33d106c9c2e40a1de-0-df1ee6e6980d5c2a7e5a934cf5e52781.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UFP Industries?
機構持有的股份告訴我們有關UFP Industries的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in UFP Industries. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see UFP Industries' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在UFP Industries擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者的某些可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣犯錯誤投資。當多個機構擁有股票時,危險在於它們可能處於「擁擠的交易」中。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個股東可能會競相拋售股票,並導致股價迅速下跌。這種風險在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中會更高。您可以看到UFP Industries的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。
![big](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240815/0-49a742772f49b2e33d106c9c2e40a1de-1-7007e4b3e36da5e51a1d2dbde002b7e1.png/big)
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in UFP Industries. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Matthew Missad is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可以共同對董事會決策產生強烈影響。對UFP Industries的對沖基金沒有太多的股份。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock,Inc.擁有13%的流通股,是最大的股東。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有流通股的11%和5.2%。此外,首席執行官Matte美薩德擁有公司0.6%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of UFP Industries
UFP Industries的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in UFP Industries, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$165m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
股東們可能會有興趣了解公司內部人員持有的UFP Industries, Inc.股票。內部人員持有價值16500萬美元的有意義的股份。大多數人都會將此視爲真正的積極因素。看看這裏,以查看這些內部人員是否最近一直在購買。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over UFP Industries. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
佔據15%所有權的普通公衆,大多由個人投資者組成,對UFP Industries產生了一定影響。儘管所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,這可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand UFP Industries better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with UFP Industries .
在考慮公司股權所有者的不同群體時,始終值得深思。但是,爲了更好地了解UFP Industries,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。因此,您應該知道我們在UFP Industries中發現的一個警告信號。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。