share_log

The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 54% of the Company

The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 54% of the Company

卡夫亨氏公司(納斯達克:KHC)受到持有公司54%股份的機構投資者的青睞。
Simply Wall St ·  08/15 08:31

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Kraft Heinz's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鑑於Kraft Heinz的股份大量由機構持有,其股價可能容易受到它們交易決策的影響。
  • 總共有9個投資者持有該公司50%的股權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着卡夫亨氏(納斯達克股票代號:KHC),那麼你必須看它的股權登記表。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔54%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kraft Heinz.

在下面的圖表中,我們將放大展示卡夫亨氏的不同所有權組。

big
NasdaqGS:KHC Ownership Breakdown August 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代號:KHC所有權拆分於2024年8月15日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kraft Heinz?

機構持股告訴我們Kraft Heinz的什麼問題?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Kraft Heinz does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kraft Heinz's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到卡夫亨氏確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好的方法是警惕地依靠機構投資者似乎帶來的驗證。他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總存在着他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易失誤時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到卡夫亨氏的歷史盈利和營業收入,但要記住它的故事並不僅限於此。

big
NasdaqGS:KHC Earnings and Revenue Growth August 15th 2024
納斯達克股票代號:KHC的盈利和營業收入增長拆分於2024年8月15日。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Kraft Heinz is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Berkshire Hathaway Inc. with 27% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。卡夫亨氏沒有被對沖基金所擁有。在我們的數據中,我們可以看到最大的股東是伯克希爾哈撒韋公司,持有公司27%的股票。舉個例子,第二大的股東持有公司約7.6%的流通股,第三大的股東持有公司5.8%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多挖掘,發現前九大股東佔註冊資本的大約50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Kraft Heinz

Kraft Heinz內部股權持有情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of The Kraft Heinz Company in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$121m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,在他們自己的名字下,公司內部人員擁有卡夫亨氏公司的不到1%。這是一家非常龐大的公司,因此看到公司內部人員擁有公司的大比例股份會令人驚訝。雖然他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有1,210萬美元(按當前價格計算)的股份。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Kraft Heinz. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個人投資者的公衆持有卡夫亨氏的19%股份。雖然此類所有權的規模可能不足以改變他們的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 27% of Kraft Heinz stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司目前持有卡夫亨氏股票的27%。這可能是一種戰略性投資,這兩家公司可能存在相關業務利益。這也可能是他們進行了分立。對這一持股進行進一步調查可能是有價值的。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kraft Heinz better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Kraft Heinz , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

考慮到擁有股份的不同集團是值得考慮的,但要想更好地了解卡夫亨氏,我們就需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮到投資風險這個永恒的魔影。我們已經確定了卡夫亨氏的三個警告信號,理解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論