share_log

Returns On Capital At Air Lease (NYSE:AL) Have Hit The Brakes

Returns On Capital At Air Lease (NYSE:AL) Have Hit The Brakes

航空租賃公司(紐交所:AL)的資本回報率已經放慢了步伐。
Simply Wall St ·  08/16 07:02

What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? Typically, we'll want to notice a trend of growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and alongside that, an expanding base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Air Lease (NYSE:AL) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.

我們應該注意到什麼早期趨勢,以識別一個能在長期內增值的股票?通常,我們希望注意到不斷增長的資本利用率(ROCE)的趨勢,以及不斷擴大的資本利用基礎。如果你看到這種情況,通常意味着這是一家擁有出色的商業模式和大量有利可圖的再投資機會的公司。就此而言,當我們觀察到航空租賃(NYSE:AL)及其ROCE趨勢時,並不是完全滿意。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for Air Lease, this is the formula:

對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是一家公司從其業務中使用的資本所能產生的稅前利潤的金額。要爲航空租賃計算這個指標,可使用以下公式:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。

0.049 = US$1.4b ÷ (US$31b - US$2.6b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.049 = 14億美元 ÷ (310億美元 - 2.6億美元)(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

So, Air Lease has an ROCE of 4.9%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Trade Distributors industry average of 13%.

因此,航空租賃的ROCE爲4.9%。以絕對值來看,這是一個較低的回報率,也低於交易分銷行業的平均水平(13%)。

big
NYSE:AL Return on Capital Employed August 16th 2024
NYSE:AL資本僱用回報2024年8月16日

In the above chart we have measured Air Lease's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Air Lease .

在上面的圖表中,我們測量了航空租賃以前的ROCE與以前的表現,但未來可能更重要。如果您想查看分析師對未來的預測,可以查看我們的免費分析師報告中的航空租賃。

How Are Returns Trending?

綜合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其資本利用率所產生的回報。考慮到股票過去五年保持穩定,如果其他指標也不錯,則可能存在機會。因此,進一步研究這家公司並確定這些趨勢是否會持續是合理的。

There are better returns on capital out there than what we're seeing at Air Lease. Over the past five years, ROCE has remained relatively flat at around 4.9% and the business has deployed 42% more capital into its operations. Given the company has increased the amount of capital employed, it appears the investments that have been made simply don't provide a high return on capital.

比起航空租賃,有更好的資本回報率。在過去的五年中,ROCE一直保持在約4.9%左右,企業的資本運營增加了42%。鑑於公司增加了資本投入,似乎所做出的投資根本沒有提供高回報率。

What We Can Learn From Air Lease's ROCE

從航空租賃的ROCE中我們可以學到什麼?

In summary, Air Lease has simply been reinvesting capital and generating the same low rate of return as before. And with the stock having returned a mere 26% in the last five years to shareholders, you could argue that they're aware of these lackluster trends. Therefore, if you're looking for a multi-bagger, we'd propose looking at other options.

總之,航空租賃只是不斷地再投資資金,並以與之前相同的低迴報率獲利。並且,由於過去五年中股票僅爲股東們帶來了26%的回報,因此可以說他們已經意識到了這些令人失望的趨勢。因此,如果你正在尋找一隻高飛股票,我們建議看看其他的選擇。

Since virtually every company faces some risks, it's worth knowing what they are, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Air Lease (of which 1 is significant!) that you should know about.

由於幾乎每家公司都面臨一些風險,了解這些風險是值得的,我們已經發現了兩個警告信號,其中一個是重要的!如果你想知道是什麼,請看看有關航空租賃的免費分析師報告。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

Hao Tian International Construction Investment Group確實存在一些風險,我們已經發現了一條警示標誌,你可能會感興趣。對於那些喜歡投資於實力雄厚的公司的人,可以查看這個由財務狀況強大、股本回報率高的公司組成的免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論