Spectrum Brands Holdings' (NYSE:SPB) Earnings Are Built On Soft Foundations
Spectrum Brands Holdings' (NYSE:SPB) Earnings Are Built On Soft Foundations
Following the release of a positive earnings report recently, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.'s (NYSE:SPB) stock performed well. Despite this, we feel that there are some reasons to be cautious with these earnings.
最近發佈了一份積極的收益報告後,Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.(紐交所:spectrum brands)的股票表現良好。儘管如此,我們認爲這些收益存在一些謹慎的原因。
A Closer Look At Spectrum Brands Holdings' Earnings
Spectrum Brands Holdings盈利的近距離觀察
Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.
很多投資者並不了解從現金流量表中計算的預付賬款率,但它實際上是衡量公司利潤由自由現金流(FCF)支撐情況的有用指標。簡單地講,這個比率將自由現金流(FCF)從淨利潤中減去,然後除以該期間公司的平均營運資產。這一比率告訴我們公司多少利潤不由自由現金流支撐。
That means a negative accrual ratio is a good thing, because it shows that the company is bringing in more free cash flow than its profit would suggest. While it's not a problem to have a positive accrual ratio, indicating a certain level of non-cash profits, a high accrual ratio is arguably a bad thing, because it indicates paper profits are not matched by cash flow. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".
這意味着負的應計比率是一件好事,因爲它顯示公司帶來的自由現金流比其利潤所暗示的要多。雖然擁有正的應計比率不是問題,表明一定水平的非現金利潤,但高的應計比率可以說是一件壞事,因爲它表明紙面利潤與現金流不匹配。引用Lewellen和Resutek 2014年的一篇論文「具有更高應計的公司趨向於在未來盈利更少」。
Spectrum Brands Holdings has an accrual ratio of 0.32 for the year to June 2024. We can therefore deduce that its free cash flow fell well short of covering its statutory profit, suggesting we might want to think twice before putting a lot of weight on the latter. Even though it reported a profit of US$140.5m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through US$478m in the last year. We saw that FCF was US$129m a year ago though, so Spectrum Brands Holdings has at least been able to generate positive FCF in the past. However, that's not all there is to consider. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part. One positive for Spectrum Brands Holdings shareholders is that it's accrual ratio was significantly better last year, providing reason to believe that it may return to stronger cash conversion in the future. Shareholders should look for improved cashflow relative to profit in the current year, if that is indeed the case.
截至2024年6月,Spectrum Brands Holdings的應計率爲0.32。因此我們可以推斷其自由現金流不足以覆蓋其法定利潤,表明我們需要三思而後行。即使它報告了140.5百萬美元的利潤,在自由現金流方面,它在去年燒掉了4780百萬美元。雖然我們看到FCF一年前爲129百萬美元,但Spectrum Brands Holdings至少能夠在過去產生正面的FCF。然而,這並不是我們需要考慮的全部內容。 應計率反映了非常規項目對法定利潤的影響,至少在一定程度上是這樣。Spectrum Brands Holdings股東的一項好消息是,它的應計率去年明顯改善,有理由相信它將來可能會回到更強大的現金轉化。如果確實是這樣,股東應該尋找在當前財年現金流相對於利潤方面的改善。
That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.
這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。
How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?
非常規項目如何影響利潤?
Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Spectrum Brands Holdings' profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$59m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. When we crunched the numbers on thousands of publicly listed companies, we found that a boost from unusual items in a given year is often not repeated the next year. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Spectrum Brands Holdings had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.
考慮到應計率,Spectrum Brands Holdings的利潤在過去12個月中因價值5900百萬美元的非常規項目而增加。我們喜歡看到利潤增長,但當非常規項目對利潤產生重大貢獻時,我們傾向於更加謹慎。當我們對數千家上市公司進行數據分析時,我們發現,在某一年中非常規項目的提高通常不會在下一年重複出現。畢竟,這正是會計學術語所暗示的。相對於其截至2024年6月的利潤來說,Spectrum Brands Holdings的非常規項目貢獻相當顯著。其他一切都相等的情況下,這很可能會使法定利潤成爲不良的指導下的潛力收益。
Our Take On Spectrum Brands Holdings' Profit Performance
我們對Spectrum Brands Holdings的利潤表現的看法
Spectrum Brands Holdings had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. Considering all this we'd argue Spectrum Brands Holdings' profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. If you want to do dive deeper into Spectrum Brands Holdings, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. When we did our research, we found 2 warning signs for Spectrum Brands Holdings (1 is a bit concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.
雖然Spectrum Brands Holdings的應計率較低,但其利潤確實受到非常規項目的推動。考慮到所有這些因素,我們認爲Spectrum Brands Holdings的利潤可能過於慷慨地顯示了其可持續的盈利水平。如果您想更深入地了解Spectrum Brands Holdings,您還需要關注它目前面臨的風險。當我們進行研究時,我們發現了Spectrum Brands Holdings的2個警示信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!)我們相信這是值得您充分注意的。
Our examination of Spectrum Brands Holdings has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with significant insider holdings to be useful.
我們對Spectrum Brands Holdings的檢查已經集中在某些因素上,這些因素可以使其盈利顯得更好。就這一點而言,我們有些懷疑。但還有很多其他方法可以了解公司的情況。例如,許多人認爲股本回報率高是有利的商業經濟指標,而其他人則喜歡「跟隨資金」並尋找內部人正在購買的股票。儘管您可能需要進行一些研究,但您可能會發現此免費公司收藏具有高股本回報率,或此股票清單具有重要內部控股的收藏很有用。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。