share_log

United Maritime's (NASDAQ:USEA) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

United Maritime's (NASDAQ:USEA) Weak Earnings Might Be Worse Than They Appear

United Maritime(納斯達克:USEA)的不佳業績可能比看起來還要糟糕
Simply Wall St ·  08/16 08:29

United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ:USEA) recently posted soft earnings but shareholders didn't react strongly. We did some analysis and found some concerning details beneath the statutory profit number.

最近聯合海運公司(納斯達克:USEA)發佈了軟實力收益,但股東沒有強烈反應。我們進行了一些分析,找到了法定利潤數字下面的一些令人擔憂的細節。

big
NasdaqCM:USEA Earnings and Revenue History August 16th 2024
納斯達克CM:USEA收益和營業收入歷史記錄2024年8月16日

Zooming In On United Maritime's Earnings

聚焦聯合海運的收益

Many investors haven't heard of the accrual ratio from cashflow, but it is actually a useful measure of how well a company's profit is backed up by free cash flow (FCF) during a given period. The accrual ratio subtracts the FCF from the profit for a given period, and divides the result by the average operating assets of the company over that time. This ratio tells us how much of a company's profit is not backed by free cashflow.

許多投資者沒有聽說過現金流的權責發生制比率,但實際上它是一個衡量公司在一定時期內利潤受自由現金流(FCF)支持程度的有用指標。該權責發生制比率將給定期間的自由現金流從利潤中減去,並將結果除以公司在此期間的平均營運資產。該比率告訴我們公司利潤中有多少是不受自由現金流支持的。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. To quote a 2014 paper by Lewellen and Resutek, "firms with higher accruals tend to be less profitable in the future".

因此,當一個公司應記比率爲負數時,實際上這被視爲一件好事,而如果該比率爲正數則被視爲一件壞事。這並不意味着我們應該擔心正的應記比率,但值得注意的是,當應計比率相當高時,引用Lewellen和Resutek在2014年的一篇論文"高應計的公司未來的盈利能力較差"。

For the year to June 2024, United Maritime had an accrual ratio of 0.21. Therefore, we know that it's free cashflow was significantly lower than its statutory profit, which is hardly a good thing. Even though it reported a profit of US$7.45m, a look at free cash flow indicates it actually burnt through US$17m in the last year. We also note that United Maritime's free cash flow was actually negative last year as well, so we could understand if shareholders were bothered by its outflow of US$17m. Having said that, there is more to the story. We can see that unusual items have impacted its statutory profit, and therefore the accrual ratio.

爲2024年6月的一年,聯合海運的應計比率爲0.21。因此,我們知道它的自由現金流顯著低於其法定利潤,這絕非一件好事。儘管它報告了745萬美元的利潤,但自由現金流的觀察表明,它實際上在過去一年中燒掉了1700萬美元。我們還注意到,聯合海運的自由現金流在去年實際上也是負的,所以我們可以理解股東對其1700萬美元的流出感到煩惱。話雖如此,故事還有更多內容。我們可以看到,異常項目影響了其法定利潤,因此影響了應計比率。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓您想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看基於其估計的未來盈利能力的互動圖表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

非常規項目如何影響利潤?

As it happens, there are a few different things to consider when we look at United Maritime's profit and the last one we'll mention is US$12m gain booked as unusual items. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. Which is hardly surprising, given the name. United Maritime had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to June 2024. As a result, we can surmise that the unusual items are making its statutory profit significantly stronger than it would otherwise be.

恰好,當我們查看聯合海運的利潤以及最後一個利潤時,有幾個不同的事情需要考慮,其中一個是作爲異常項目預定的1200萬美元的增益。雖然我們喜歡看到利潤的增加,但當異常項目對其產生重大貢獻時,我們傾向於更加謹慎。我們在全球大部分上市公司上跑了數字,發現異常項目很普遍是一次性的。鑑於名稱,這並不奇怪。相對於其2024年6月的利潤,United Maritime的異常項目貢獻非常重要。因此,我們可以推斷,異常項目正在使其法定利潤顯著強於它本來應該的水平。

Our Take On United Maritime's Profit Performance

我們對聯合海運的利潤表現的看法

Summing up, United Maritime received a nice boost to profit from unusual items, but could not match its paper profit with free cash flow. Considering all this we'd argue United Maritime's profits probably give an overly generous impression of its sustainable level of profitability. In light of this, if you'd like to do more analysis on the company, it's vital to be informed of the risks involved. To help with this, we've discovered 5 warning signs (2 make us uncomfortable!) that you ought to be aware of before buying any shares in United Maritime.

總起來說,聯合海運從異常項目中獲得了良好的利潤提升,但無法將其紙面利潤與自由現金流相匹配。考慮到這一點,我們認爲聯合海運的利潤可能給人一種過於慷慨的盈利能力持續水平的印象。鑑於這一點,如果您想對該公司進行更多的分析,了解涉及的風險是至關重要的。爲此,我們已發現5個警告信號(其中2個讓我們感到不舒服!)在購買聯合海運的任何股票之前必須知道。

Our examination of United Maritime has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. Some people consider a high return on equity to be a good sign of a quality business. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks with high insider ownership.

我們對聯合海運的審查集中在某些因素上,這些因素可以使其收益看起來比實際情況要好。在這個基礎上,我們有些懷疑。但是,如果您能集中精力在細節上,總會有更多的發現。有些人認爲高股本回報率是優質企業的良好跡象。因此,您可能希望查看這些具有高股本回報率的公司的免費合集,或具有高內部所有權的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論