share_log

These 4 Measures Indicate That Gartner (NYSE:IT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

These 4 Measures Indicate That Gartner (NYSE:IT) Is Using Debt Reasonably Well

這4項措施表明Gartner(紐交所:IT)合理運用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  08/17 08:07

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Gartner, Inc. (NYSE:IT) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

David Iben說得很好:「波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本永久損失。」當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的利用債務情況,因爲債務過載可能會導致破產。我們注意到加特納股份有限公司(紐交所:IT)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但更重要的問題是: 這些債務製造了多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

一般來說,只有當公司無法輕鬆地償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是使用自己的現金流。資本主義的一部分是「創造性破壞」過程,即銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東以控制債務。當然,在業務中,債務可以是一個重要的工具,特別是對於資本密集型企業。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要看其現金和債務的總和。

What Is Gartner's Debt?

加特納的債務是什麼?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Gartner had US$2.46b in debt in June 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$1.24b in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.22b.

下面的圖表(您可以單擊以獲得更詳細的信息)顯示,加特納在2024年6月有24.6億美元的債務,與前一年相同。反過來,它擁有12.4億美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲12.2億美元。

big
NYSE:IT Debt to Equity History August 17th 2024
紐交所:IT的債務股本比歷史記錄於2024年8月17日

A Look At Gartner's Liabilities

審視加特納的負債

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Gartner had liabilities of US$3.46b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$3.32b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.24b as well as receivables valued at US$1.43b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$4.11b.

放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到加特納有346億美元的負債在12個月內到期,332億美元的負債超過12個月到期。抵消這些義務,它擁有12.4億美元的現金以及14.3億美元的應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債超過了其現金和(短期)應收賬款的總額411億美元。

Since publicly traded Gartner shares are worth a very impressive total of US$37.3b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

由於公開交易的加特納股票總價值爲373億美元,因此似乎這種程度的負債不會構成重大威脅。然而,我們認爲值得關注其資產負債表的強度,因爲它可能隨着時間而改變。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Gartner's net debt is only 0.94 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 14.8 times over. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On the other hand, Gartner saw its EBIT drop by 3.2% in the last twelve months. That sort of decline, if sustained, will obviously make debt harder to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Gartner can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

加特納的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.94倍。它的EBIT覆蓋了其利息支出的整整14.8倍。因此,您可以認爲它受到債務威脅的程度不比大象受老鼠威脅大。另一方面,加特納在過去十二個月中的EBIT下降了3.2%。如果這種下降持續下去,很明顯將使債務更難控制。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定加特納能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現這份有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Gartner generated free cash flow amounting to a very robust 92% of its EBIT, more than we'd expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,公司只能用冷酷無情的現金而不是會計利潤償還債務。因此,邏輯上的下一步是查看與實際自由現金流相匹配的EBIT的比例。在過去的三年中,加特納產生了非常強大的92%的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的比例,這超出了我們的預期。這使其可以在必要時償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Gartner's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. Zooming out, Gartner seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Gartner that you should be aware of.

令人欣慰的是,加特納令人印象深刻的利息覆蓋率意味着它在處理債務方面更佔優勢。但是,更令人憂慮的是它的EBIT增長率。放大來看,加特納似乎相當合理地使用債務。雖然債務確實帶來風險,但在明智使用時也可以帶來更高的股權回報。顯然,資產負債表是您分析債務的主要關注領域。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。例如,我們已經確定了對加特納的2個警告信號,這是您應該了解的。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論