share_log

Individual Investors Are LB Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002601) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.5b

Individual Investors Are LB Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002601) Biggest Owners and Were Hit After Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.5b

個人投資者是龍蟒佰利聯集團股份有限公司(SZSE:002601)的最大股東,在市值下降15億元人民幣後遭到重創。
Simply Wall St ·  08/18 10:07

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over LB Group by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders own 32% of LB Group
  • 個體投資者對龍佰集團的重要控制意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面具有更大的權力。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 內部人持有龍佰集團32%的股份。

Every investor in LB Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002601) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

龍佰集團(SZSE:002601)的每個投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。 持有37%股份的個體投資者群體持有最大的股份。 換句話說,該集團面臨的最大上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While insiders who own 32% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥37b last week,individual investors took the most losses.

上週市值下跌至370億元后,持有32%股份的內部人受到壓力,但個體投資者遭受最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about LB Group.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關龍佰集團的什麼信息。

big
SZSE:002601 Ownership Breakdown August 18th 2024
SZSE:002601所有權結構2024年8月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LB Group?

機構持股告訴我們有關龍佰集團的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that LB Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of LB Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到龍佰集團確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股份的很大一部分。 這表明專業投資者中出現了一些信譽。 但我們不能僅憑這一事實作爲依據,因爲機構有時會進行不良投資,就像每個人一樣。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 因此,值得檢查龍佰集團的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。 當然,也要記住考慮其他因素。

big
SZSE:002601 Earnings and Revenue Growth August 18th 2024
SZSE:002601收入和營業收入增長2024年8月18日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in LB Group. The company's largest shareholder is Estate Of Xu Gang, with ownership of 14%. Ran Xu is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and Rui Qing Tan holds about 8.3% of the company stock. Ran Xu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Head of Sales.

對龍佰集團進行投資的對沖基金並不多。 這家公司最大的股東是徐剛生態,持股量爲14%。 Ran Xu是第二大股東,持有普通股的13%,而Rui Qing Tan持有該公司股票的約8.3%。第二大股東Ran Xu碰巧也是銷售總監。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of LB Group

龍佰集團的內部人持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of LB Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥37b, and insiders have CN¥12b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

似乎內部人持有龍佰集團股份的比例相當大。 它市值僅爲370億人民幣,內部人名下持有價值120億人民幣的股票。 這相當重要。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可能希望訪問此免費圖表,顯示內部人的最近交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 37% stake in LB Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

通常是個體投資者的普通公衆持有龍佰集團的37%股份。 儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在其有利的政策決策方面產生影響,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 17%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的17%,私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人的身份對公共公司產生興趣。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with LB Group (including 1 which is significant) .

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是非常有價值的,但有其他更重要的因素。 爲此,您應該了解我們發現的2個警告信號,其中1個非常重要的龍佰集團。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論